IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Jmap] Address Validation (was Re: Submission)

Paul Smith <paul@pscs.co.uk> Tue, 25 April 2017 15:03 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@pscs.co.uk>
X-Original-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5D79131B95 for <jmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 08:03:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.621
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.621 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nCaeDlPCWcu4 for <jmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 08:03:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.pscs.co.uk (mail.pscs.co.uk [188.65.177.237]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58AE7131B96 for <jmap@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 08:03:04 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-Results: mail.pscs.co.uk; spf=none; auth=pass (cram-md5) smtp.auth=paul
Received: from lmail.pscs.co.uk ([82.68.5.206]) by mail.pscs.co.uk ([188.65.177.237] running VPOP3) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 15:52:30 +0100
Authentication-Results: lmail.pscs.co.uk; spf=none; auth=pass (cram-md5) smtp.auth=paul
Received: from [192.168.66.101] ([192.168.66.101]) by lmail.pscs.co.uk ([192.168.66.70] running VPOP3) with ESMTPSA; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 15:46:35 +0100
To: Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name>, Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>, jmap@ietf.org
References: <1492996915.3310412.953749536.0F1C8B46@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20170424014957.39235.qmail@ary.lan> <emb951e04d-3dc9-4244-915b-21bd272245ff@bodybag> <alpine.OSX.2.20.1704240925190.68584@ary.qy> <e41c88ed-2ed5-47b8-923c-bfac12334808@gulbrandsen.priv.no> <DB03A7F421F2B9E4A8C6AD1D@caldav.corp.apple.com> <6319482c-e53f-4483-870b-844e23030f8c@gulbrandsen.priv.no> <A9622742-D931-4975-9572-04878949EDDE@fugue.com> <a9edd67d-64fc-56cc-a64d-92db10e3369d@pscs.co.uk> <em84e4d1f0-cfb3-46c6-99e0-a3398bda2bc4@bodybag> <CA68A753DA49B845CDCDD17A@caldav.corp.apple.com> <b76a67ec-28df-a13f-9960-a61ce1cec47a@pscs.co.uk> <129D134A09971EC26CEF9853@cyrus.local>
From: Paul Smith <paul@pscs.co.uk>
Message-ID: <37be91b9-21c9-87f5-10a4-c7f05357c940@pscs.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 15:46:34 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <129D134A09971EC26CEF9853@cyrus.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Authenticated-Sender: paul
X-Server: VPOP3 Enterprise V7.2 - Registered
X-Organisation: Paul Smith Computer Services
X-VPOP3Tester: 12 345
X-Authenticated-Sender: paul
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jmap/mibvLA-DFlr_ueS8vCorGhRO6FQ>
Subject: Re: [Jmap] Address Validation (was Re: Submission)
X-BeenThere: jmap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: JSON Message Access Protocol <jmap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jmap/>
List-Post: <mailto:jmap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 15:03:32 -0000

On 25/04/2017 15:12, Cyrus Daboo wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> --On April 25, 2017 at 3:01:31 PM +0100 Paul Smith <paul@pscs.co.uk> 
> wrote:
>
>> (BTW, did you receive the "delivered" MDN from our server from the DSN
>> request? It looks like it left here OK)
>
> Your server gave me a "delivered" status. 

Good :-) Does Mulberry indicate this in the 'sent items' folder somehow? 
I think that's what users would like (?)

(I haven't used Mulberry for a while - IIRC, it disappeared for a while 
some time ago, and I hadn't realised it had come back...)

> I think the later is not very useful as I expect my own server to be 
> reliable, and if not expect to know about problems pretty quickly.

Agreed, but that's what the earlier person was saying would be good. For 
the average user it tells them that THEIR mail server has sent the 
message out, which is the best you can expect if the onward server 
doesn't support any form of notification.

If the 'sent items' folder indicates somehow when messages have been 
sent out by the MSA (or delivered to the recipient if possible) then I 
can see that would help usability.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email