IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Jmap] Submission

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Fri, 21 April 2017 15:02 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 432671294D3 for <jmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 08:02:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GDl20R2Nwwt1 for <jmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 08:02:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x22e.google.com (mail-qt0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 902D4124D37 for <jmap@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 08:02:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id c45so71607008qtb.1 for <jmap@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 08:02:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=lcagNObZW9A9eg/F/iBMvmLkL3hPOdPirzbHc9OgxT0=; b=vwblRFZ/ZqfuFcyR0dYRbopQSFBgzQXvXpFjJtuLPIbUbnYkegvtlaRxodFt+i5HOH r9nNoYAv1m1T915cdKR2w1k7GUdofrxv5uJl0Lq7iFn9o6pqdhr0CqtyJQtvR8Bc24pA fioWp46rc4IP+sQUAK2z1DgDI6zAiM20TbU7PLOiulc/UZbIeyC6VHhj0XfJ5ky6T+FE Nee99JQ0/XJ1hWpwaz1DkidYm+9EuoARbNH3bk8OROfj94VSRumeFvO2H2vCEVM41fQ5 4DRo2rpZd1O4a/cfdIJ+vCu6PDqlokVTd3fAPfXgkp13s/DO0OGD5aOAk1AGzUVTqo8z P7jA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=lcagNObZW9A9eg/F/iBMvmLkL3hPOdPirzbHc9OgxT0=; b=FD47izYSiQQ4QIfZbN9WFfZeKn+GS86EeNFlCuJYvnUas11tWiv35ZsZAd5xKyi6fi tkVysAs8sdU2v1tXPvlDTANyCuK59OLGmqY71GwMZh2NkZno8l5zZtBTDD79cfqjyrOe 4IsFHi/VnewZ2QmI5YC1dWKXKebYTFzRLWLqDPiWPa9T9nQQYTFE/GKwUi7o6x8P5JsO u4C/0DTtOjyDWZUN9kbHGHRnwSIHJZskUsYlg46YMbzr036hyJfYiM9qkVXFsKL00ggj TcuMnBe/NwyVVaWKAJod1nxyY+ofrBW01DXg70opKW0XTpgZvAO7dc6tQg4FBEftA0LZ Wwqw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/5G+3OnE3PISvfmuouhVXrAkd/BJAM8Nya91yyCoc6Hq+fhYOm0 6A4Y0F1xj9CTP8xrdFU=
X-Received: by 10.200.53.156 with SMTP id k28mr14014918qtb.202.1492786946659; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 08:02:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.30.228] (c-73-167-64-188.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [73.167.64.188]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m30sm6467839qtg.57.2017.04.21.08.02.25 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 21 Apr 2017 08:02:25 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <7ED5BB51-F552-4E2E-A152-55D4DE5CF917@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_0C901AE7-CA6E-49C1-95CD-6584F0BD29C5"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 11:02:24 -0400
In-Reply-To: <4471fa93-2321-4a7e-87b0-fbb00927d584@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
Cc: jmap@ietf.org
To: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
References: <20170419163429.8556.qmail@ary.lan> <87d1c873cf.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> <alpine.OSX.2.20.1704191353500.43511@ary.qy> <01QDEV2QM6XC00005O@mauve.mrochek.com> <BC098A22-2837-4316-822A-27232A896EF1@fugue.com> <4471fa93-2321-4a7e-87b0-fbb00927d584@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jmap/oe8t7lBGbGGiV1addWnJXvn6vKE>
Subject: Re: [Jmap] Submission
X-BeenThere: jmap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: JSON Message Access Protocol <jmap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jmap/>
List-Post: <mailto:jmap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 15:02:29 -0000

On Apr 21, 2017, at 10:34 AM, Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no> wrote:
> Won't the nexthop generally be the thing that the port-587 server forwards to? After all, JMAP already handles authentication, and it's not clear to me that a typical JMAP server is easily able to authenticate on behalf of the end user in a way that a port-587 server accepts.

This would have been my assumption, but we seem to be hearing different things from some folks who are operating large installations, so I think it's worth discussing.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email