IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Jmap] Address Validation (was Re: Submission)

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Tue, 25 April 2017 13:41 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C5E912944A for <jmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 06:41:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qDS08s1MLNQ4 for <jmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 06:41:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x230.google.com (mail-qk0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 869A21270A7 for <jmap@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 06:41:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x230.google.com with SMTP id f76so64547166qke.2 for <jmap@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 06:41:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=EgRrK4wL8NEE1FCnJ8njYOzFhpIjOiB+PlmZ9Z/t6Qs=; b=1dxPjujB2bY0IK6dL9D/y58nSKAnf7jiIyGHZYT4dLHHp86wLSBTh4oa3Fh84gBKG3 wxDUAz7ZCWRO4CqXJbDW69QJH45VvFkf/YmuW1C8PaFS+i2NgVM54yVsmqd+ZAyl6cIp fjEucqDFUu9EgqL33NZhmQLxfv6w6xJH9KC9WBZHB3PMHiuKjAdLDYek97JmlOemPGM8 KqyVtphw0U+PiaugViEszj9mxo37fosFOwH8cQkVSidbcjNBCOhind7//4RYURA4k85J QGVSjxOhRinVmzkGWL02VdTyAqaaZHewlnlcoReD3n64IVyW5C4uO2oDdjzwN6gAkDXA qvZA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=EgRrK4wL8NEE1FCnJ8njYOzFhpIjOiB+PlmZ9Z/t6Qs=; b=C0Rw8N63M1Bu68AH2r6+B9+8bJrp8LBKtwPrv9mVnVBXpZs1pijmgqj1J4EwGcxJMu W9ikIzutPqe7mOYEh3JtFox0GNp2dl6WJLeHYKQoEXi+q0uSiZwXVd+QVSgYd8v1EtkF NIvnnHx4BVs1GuippN5idb8QoAKtAv4mcPfGtz+oGGP9a4yjuj91FEttVpp2TLONDrkG JP68Ans6ZpQ+9eTP/VbGFzZh1EK+9QVeHV9kAUPpvMdKrmqNiAtdlYdZrStTstNRm1u7 FMmin5M2qTrhmKBqUsNBAFtr+7mxZN7JyY+AHzqW1gJWikb1E01zISzTZouBgAnfuVOA f3hw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/4Z5ghaEYY4V2eHGY7JC0NbfrAEU3gXtgGKTT/7HItFbPmw9Zkt jB8Z6JrZTLwNH1GLFKQ=
X-Received: by 10.55.165.132 with SMTP id o126mr10833285qke.95.1493127670667; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 06:41:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from macbook-pro-6.home.arpa (pool-108-31-94-75.washdc.fios.verizon.net. [108.31.94.75]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u8sm15135794qtb.55.2017.04.25.06.41.09 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 25 Apr 2017 06:41:09 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <A29BDC33-3B42-46A0-8272-9DD6CC771A0F@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_4F0B8B3D-D6DD-4672-B28D-D6164F8DB51A"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 09:41:08 -0400
In-Reply-To: <a9edd67d-64fc-56cc-a64d-92db10e3369d@pscs.co.uk>
Cc: jmap@ietf.org
To: Paul Smith <paul@pscs.co.uk>
References: <1492996915.3310412.953749536.0F1C8B46@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20170424014957.39235.qmail@ary.lan> <emb951e04d-3dc9-4244-915b-21bd272245ff@bodybag> <alpine.OSX.2.20.1704240925190.68584@ary.qy> <e41c88ed-2ed5-47b8-923c-bfac12334808@gulbrandsen.priv.no> <DB03A7F421F2B9E4A8C6AD1D@caldav.corp.apple.com> <6319482c-e53f-4483-870b-844e23030f8c@gulbrandsen.priv.no> <A9622742-D931-4975-9572-04878949EDDE@fugue.com> <a9edd67d-64fc-56cc-a64d-92db10e3369d@pscs.co.uk>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jmap/fSjRRyG0fN3c-trRZyyByBpggNk>
Subject: Re: [Jmap] Address Validation (was Re: Submission)
X-BeenThere: jmap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: JSON Message Access Protocol <jmap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jmap/>
List-Post: <mailto:jmap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 13:41:13 -0000

On Apr 25, 2017, at 4:33 AM, Paul Smith <paul@pscs.co.uk> wrote:
> I may be wrong, but I believe you can already do that with DSN/MDNs. However, I have yet to see an MUA which does it even though it doesn't seem like it'd be that hard to do with the MUA requesting success DSNs and parsing the responses.

One of the stated goals of the JMAP work is to remove one of the major pain points in writing MUAs: IMAP (specifically the lack of consistent implementation, which causes interop issues).   So perhaps we will see more MUA innovation.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email