IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Jmap] Submission

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Fri, 21 April 2017 15:33 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D87DB129543 for <jmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 08:33:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.121
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.121 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FtTZBd5cCXsz for <jmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 08:33:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (www.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::4945:4343]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B08C8129510 for <jmap@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 08:33:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 19102 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2017 15:33:08 -0000
Received: from unknown (64.57.183.18) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 21 Apr 2017 15:33:08 -0000
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 15:32:46 -0000
Message-ID: <20170421153246.28229.qmail@ary.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: jmap@ietf.org
Cc: adrien@qbik.com
In-Reply-To: <em470cf3b9-5af0-4eb9-a7d0-1d6273df597a@bodybag>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jmap/dvyLYvb5cK00rHv1ORjd_OzLGvI>
Subject: Re: [Jmap] Submission
X-BeenThere: jmap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: JSON Message Access Protocol <jmap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jmap/>
List-Post: <mailto:jmap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 15:33:11 -0000

In article <em470cf3b9-5af0-4eb9-a7d0-1d6273df597a@bodybag> you write:
>I think trying to pass through SMTP extensions when there may not even 
>be an upstream SMTP server is going to be problematic let alone ugly.

It seems very likely that there will be a submission server, if there
is any hope of sending mail to the billion people who use SMTP mail
now.

>Which extensions do we think are even in scope for this?

All of them.  A more interesting question is which ones are likely to
be useful in this context.  A quick look suggests 8BITMIME, SUBMITTER,
DSN, DELIVERBY, FUTURERELEASE, SMTPUTF8, CONPERM, MT-PRIORITY, RRVS,
and maybe BURL.

R's,
John

PS:

>Sounds like DKIM didn't think through the need to transform mail. ...

How about if you read the dkim list archives and get back to us on that?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email