Re: [Jmap] Submission

["Adrien de Croy" <[e-mail]>]

------ Original Message ------
From: "John Levine" <[e-mail]>
To: "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>
Cc: "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>
Sent: 22/04/2017 11:19:22 AM
Subject: Re: [Jmap] Submission

>In article <emc8d121a7-bfae-4074-8de0-9716d42f680b@bodybag> you write:
>>
>>I did mean inter-organizational.  E.g. external messaging.
>
>In that case, I don't understand your point at all.  Existing mail
>software uses the IETF submission protocols to send billions of
>inter-organizational messages every day, frequently from rather
>limited clients like a 2G flip phone or the laser printer on my desk
>or the NAS in the server room.
>
>Given the multi-decade track record here, what makes this so daunting
>if you wrap some JSON around it?

because in that case we're not looking to improve anything.

My point is that (wrt submision) if we design a system for MUA->"the 
system" which allows for a rich experience for the MUA, then if we don't 
make it impossible for this protocol to be used to extend the system 
outside of the organisation, then we can get the rich experience for all 
mail, not just mail to your colleagues on the same server.

I'm imagining a system where the JMAP server uses JMAP to send it the 
next hop as well if required, and so on, thereby avoiding the 
limitations of SMTP.

>
>
>R's,
>John
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Jmap mailing list
>[e-mail]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jmap