IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Mtgvenue] Issue #21: unfiltered should be mandatory

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Wed, 19 April 2017 16:21 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FB20128CB9 for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 09:21:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.503
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.503 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gz7KJWeEZnYD for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 09:21:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E07E127775 for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 09:21:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2583; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1492618902; x=1493828502; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=9fBEUXE33Ke7RvACsZNU/Aj+nl4a8vVvOOnh3K+UBjE=; b=TkxurWlcaUMb5SXnTmoUCUoPqw5oQaW5b4oh2DpUkejEmyVBTWgJiylq wOZRM9t7MOppEcK70uxx6K7bOp02vRtgFJsKAt5OuhkXViNwOgjwokxiJ K7GHhAPhYx9FO+gEXHnX6WP/2awO/dH4/3IQ+rgm00JwWkWQZpTupJQFQ M=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 481
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CBAQA2jvdY/xbLJq1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBiSeKFXOQT5YDgg8Hhh0ChEEYAQIBAQEBAQEBayiFFgYjVhALQgICVwYNCAEBihWqH4Imiy4BAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARIPiDArC4Jjh12CXwEEnS+ECIIRjGOBaBiFMYM+hl2UER84gQUmHQgYFYcrPolKAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.37,222,1488844800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="654103156"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-2.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Apr 2017 16:21:38 +0000
Received: from [10.61.105.160] (dhcp-10-61-105-160.cisco.com [10.61.105.160]) by aer-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v3JGLbwW017871; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 16:21:37 GMT
To: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <37de22dc-04a4-f868-698e-cf03cd791957@cisco.com> <5CF8C201-00C4-4E07-BAB6-8CC5A30B54F5@cooperw.in> <7aba8a44-f1b8-b368-2b9a-91ad4bccfbcc@cisco.com> <D6DA3121-3365-4409-9DF1-8B761608DA11@gmail.com> <CA+9kkMDa4rQfwW=-M4nEgd2GPSmB_2NbT0owZA7yhHdU3AuS7A@mail.gmail.com> <66423faa-16ae-49a6-5703-e4021c198b76@cisco.com> <CA+9kkMBS=sQpN5YHRCmVE2ygKzUe+7pr4d0+TF33UcxySvFfdQ@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: "mtgvenue@ietf.org" <mtgvenue@ietf.org>, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <0569f4aa-8033-f2b3-84ed-60533607d34e@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 18:21:36 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CA+9kkMBS=sQpN5YHRCmVE2ygKzUe+7pr4d0+TF33UcxySvFfdQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4nxPRDA8akOAuF8JWesFH3G1m20f125HR"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/3XdN9gjwGfh9ulIqBkiJsUVijgE>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] Issue #21: unfiltered should be mandatory
X-BeenThere: mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IAOC meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mtgvenue/>
List-Post: <mailto:mtgvenue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 16:21:44 -0000

Hi Ted,

Let me then try to articulate two concrete criteria:

"MANDATORY: Within the bounds of BCP38, both the Facility and IETF
hotels provide unfiltered access to the maximum extent permitted by law."

And then:

"IMPORTANT: Within the bounds of BCP38, the Facility and IETF Hotels
provide unfiltered access.  (This criterion is present for the cases
where laws may require ISPs to filter certain traffic)."[*]

Is the IAOC comfortable having to do the research on that?  Are others
comfortable with that?  Wordsmithing?  Is this what people want?  Please
comment.

Eliot
[*] The text in ()s is there to explain why there are two.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email