Re: [Mtgvenue] Issue #21: unfiltered should be mandatory
"Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu@cisco.com> Tue, 18 April 2017 22:32 UTC
Return-Path: <eckelcu@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD2621293E3 for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 15:32:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.522
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aTr6-hDf6u3m for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 15:32:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7AF821314C8 for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 15:31:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=5922; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1492554716; x=1493764316; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=IXGWuQC5k4xuGuvV9ogJ3H+mA0NAgDKy8nVhKo1sFiA=; b=Ayau0mQcFo3ufyl6dQIDsaEvT8ZIa2XJ2PwaCCnZtUEg56F5iLxSApLg Au83VEVuqWC2pvF+c2LTn3L4MO+vCmZZiHA/WVMshlfbGNVuJVnNH39rM RW/gjv5b0nVGdsT/Kmuf+L69sBlxc+hZCcpEBYR5FWdtf5PHHPEWID8zR k=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0A9AQB+k/ZY/5hdJa1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBgm5lYYELB4NfihWRYogeiA+FNIIPhiQCGoNcPxgBAgEBAQEBAQFrKIUVAQEBAQMjVhACAQgRAwECKwICAh8RHQgCBAENBYoBAxWsEIImK4cODYNpAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBHYhagm2CUYImgmYugjEFnGc7AY4jhEaRSIsLiQIBHziBBWMVVQGGU3WHfoENAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.37,219,1488844800"; d="scan'208,217";a="238168290"
Received: from rcdn-core-1.cisco.com ([173.37.93.152]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 18 Apr 2017 22:31:34 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-019.cisco.com (xch-rcd-019.cisco.com [173.37.102.29]) by rcdn-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v3IMVY5E015061 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 18 Apr 2017 22:31:34 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-018.cisco.com (173.36.7.28) by XCH-RCD-019.cisco.com (173.37.102.29) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 17:31:33 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-018.cisco.com ([173.36.7.28]) by XCH-ALN-018.cisco.com ([173.36.7.28]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 17:31:33 -0500
From: "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu@cisco.com>
To: Jim Martin <jim@daedelus.com>, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
CC: "mtgvenue@ietf.org" <mtgvenue@ietf.org>, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [Mtgvenue] Issue #21: unfiltered should be mandatory
Thread-Index: AQHSuFUEAal3CBPNv0mUqWy3/WBgyqHLpkeA///ulgA=
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 22:31:33 +0000
Message-ID: <33239EE5-D71B-4D8A-973F-FD6079BE96B6@cisco.com>
References: <37de22dc-04a4-f868-698e-cf03cd791957@cisco.com> <5CF8C201-00C4-4E07-BAB6-8CC5A30B54F5@cooperw.in> <7aba8a44-f1b8-b368-2b9a-91ad4bccfbcc@cisco.com> <D6DA3121-3365-4409-9DF1-8B761608DA11@gmail.com> <b8adeb34-ab01-b846-9d10-0d6414749e2f@cisco.com> <1CA5B535-33C3-4F3A-9AD4-0003CA2D07FB@daedelus.com>
In-Reply-To: <1CA5B535-33C3-4F3A-9AD4-0003CA2D07FB@daedelus.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.20.0.170309
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.20.182.35]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_33239EE5D71B4D8A973FFD6079BE96B6ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/WWghdNfSgHO9SWv7pilJU28zw5w>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] Issue #21: unfiltered should be mandatory
X-BeenThere: mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IAOC meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mtgvenue/>
List-Post: <mailto:mtgvenue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 22:32:04 -0000
From: Mtgvenue <mtgvenue-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Jim Martin <jim@daedelus.com> Date: Tuesday, April 18, 2017 at 9:33 AM To: "lear@cisco.com" <lear@cisco.com> Cc: "mtgvenue@ietf.org" <mtgvenue@ietf.org>, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] Issue #21: unfiltered should be mandatory We keep this very much in mind in our design and operations. Our goal is to facilitate not just unencumbered Internet access, but also to allow new work to take place. [cue] This has been true and important for the IETF hackathons as well. Jim and his team have been very accommodating in this regard. Cheers, Chares
- Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory Lou Berger
- Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory Lou Berger
- Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory Fred Baker
- Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory Eliot Lear
- Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory Lou Berger
- Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory Lou Berger
- Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory Eliot Lear
- Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory Pete Resnick
- Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory Pete Resnick
- Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory Deen, Glenn (NBCUniversal)
- Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory Lou Berger
- [Mtgvenue] Issue #21: unfiltered should be mandat… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Issue #21: unfiltered should be ma… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Issue #21: unfiltered should be ma… Yoav Nir
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Issue #21: unfiltered should be ma… Jim Martin
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Issue #21: unfiltered should be ma… Ted Hardie
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Issue #21: unfiltered should be ma… Fred Baker
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Issue #21: unfiltered should be ma… Tobias Gondrom
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Issue #21: unfiltered should be ma… Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Issue #21: unfiltered should be ma… Yoav Nir
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Issue #21: unfiltered should be ma… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Issue #21: unfiltered should be ma… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Issue #21: unfiltered should be ma… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Issue #21: unfiltered should be ma… Ted Hardie
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Issue #21: unfiltered should be ma… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Issue #21: unfiltered should be ma… Fred Baker
- [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory Eliot Lear
- Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory Lou Berger
- Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory Eliot Lear
- Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory Lou Berger
- Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory Dave Crocker
- Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory Eliot Lear
- Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory Dave Crocker
- Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory Pete Resnick
- Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory Ted Hardie
- Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory Dave Crocker
- Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory Ted Hardie
- Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory Eliot Lear
- Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory Dave Crocker
- Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory Warren Kumari
- Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory Ted Hardie
- Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory Lou Berger
- Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory Pete Resnick
- Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory Ted Hardie
- Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory Lou Berger
- Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory Pete Resnick
- Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory Dave Crocker
- Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory Dave Crocker
- Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory Dave Crocker
- Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory Pete Resnick
- Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory Dave Crocker
- Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory Eliot Lear
- Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory Eliot Lear
- Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory Alissa Cooper
- Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory Alissa Cooper
- Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory Fred Baker