IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Wed, 05 April 2017 16:02 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B905126C89 for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Apr 2017 09:02:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.523
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.523 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rS3Wg1wcAowH for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Apr 2017 09:02:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-1.cisco.com (alln-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.142.88]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01C0F1293FD for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Apr 2017 09:02:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2017; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1491408125; x=1492617725; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version: in-reply-to; bh=MNFQkWdSuog8ihf2FF4zWtGHX7Wcye2goEAWxDEahRE=; b=FKcUUVKvh+AAZM/W21nT287WPj0F49pI0B4xoaa+pbW9zRbghiFUkoQg 6UGfviS2J0x+4zK36E8OS8BADnXJIl/dDJuQpJ6Wli3Ncij0MZsQ6J0OD CCq7bxNeIW8GN/rok8REpX4+VzdP88mQWY9yQiSYUHZB5MemexbSuEUOx s=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 481
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BlAQAZFOVY/5RdJa1dGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBg1SFT4oSkTyVVYIOhiICg1I/GAECAQEBAQEBAWsohRYBBSNmCw4KKgICVwYBDAgBAYoKq12CJoptAQEBAQEBAQMBAQEBAQEBEg+IU4Jrh1yCXwEEnHCDfIINjEmBZYh8hluTdh84gQUlFggYFYccPol+AQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.36,279,1486425600"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="405056142"
Received: from rcdn-core-12.cisco.com ([173.37.93.148]) by alln-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Apr 2017 16:02:04 +0000
Received: from [10.86.241.121] (che-vpn-cluster-1-376.cisco.com [10.86.241.121]) by rcdn-core-12.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v35G22ZU020062; Wed, 5 Apr 2017 16:02:03 GMT
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, "mtgvenue@ietf.org" <mtgvenue@ietf.org>
References: <37de22dc-04a4-f868-698e-cf03cd791957@cisco.com> <a1b4fb14-64ec-2848-91e7-faa93ba6e697@labn.net>
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <cfd7ace5-d834-fb41-57a4-ea11d0126f0f@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2017 18:02:01 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <a1b4fb14-64ec-2848-91e7-faa93ba6e697@labn.net>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="CgI5UhT5inBlWjFL27iU0iVqqRCCmJpkx"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/h-yL3mBhb2lFINrQU_aX3TNQEgA>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory
X-BeenThere: mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IAOC meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mtgvenue/>
List-Post: <mailto:mtgvenue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2017 16:02:07 -0000

This one gets removed based on comments in the room.


On 4/5/17 5:56 PM, Lou Berger wrote:
> Eliot/All,
>
>
> On 4/5/2017 9:40 AM, Eliot Lear wrote:
>> The economics of the Venue allow the meeting to be...
> Is this going to be moved to a "desired" category? If so, the next
> comment doesn't apply.
>
> If not, was the agreement in the room really that it is okay for the
> IAOC to select a location that is known well in advance to result in a
> net loss?
>
> Lou
>  
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email