Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory

[Pete Resnick <[e-mail]>]

On 5 Apr 2017, at 16:02, Dave Crocker wrote:

> "move or cancel" is language that only has meaning /after/ selection. 
> It is therefore formally out of scope.

Whoa there! Dave, it is not your call that this (or anything) is 
formally out of scope.

As I said at the f2f meeting, the charter is not crystal clear on this 
point:

> The MTGVENUE working group is the forum where the IETF community can
> discuss and agree on what should go into the policies, the selection
> process, and the detailed criteria going forward. All criteria and all
> other aspects of the process are open for discussion.

As Alissa said at the meeting, the charter is flexible enough to allow 
the WG to write a document that can be applied only at the beginning of 
the process, or might be applied at multiple points. She also suggested 
that we start with the initial (pre-contract) criteria first to make 
sure we reach consensus on that, and then take on other stuff if desired 
afterwards, and I believe that is good advice. In any event, nobody has 
declared issues of "move or cancel" out of scope. Please refrain from 
making such calls in the future.

pr
-- 
Pete Resnick <http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - [phone]