IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory

Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com> Tue, 11 April 2017 18:39 UTC

Return-Path: <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
X-Original-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35A6312EBFA for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 11:39:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.021
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.021 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=qti.qualcomm.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 858DNcPlTiHQ for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 11:39:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wolverine01.qualcomm.com (wolverine01.qualcomm.com [199.106.114.254]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69A2C12EBED for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 11:39:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=qti.qualcomm.com; i=@qti.qualcomm.com; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1491935946; x=1523471946; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version; bh=wE349MerwOHHW8OAmHUMI+flDTqCohXIEufue7VS/qI=; b=HEZSM7iikCz0gGJFND/jFaKW59XOz5wGikl5ppjzLQUzndqyfHH+X8j6 4ZOuvh1ioskrWW/lhHfS/ys+32VdNtAPOeF2Z/l90/MQGRuUq8hCdaEtG N9ncKG3X/Mgl35R0B5LrbRxmBTlhHsErAPg1M6vzbZAsu7TEn5sSOWqVa A=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.37,186,1488873600"; d="scan'208";a="277889978"
Received: from unknown (HELO Ironmsg04-R.qualcomm.com) ([10.53.140.108]) by wolverine01.qualcomm.com with ESMTP; 11 Apr 2017 11:39:05 -0700
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5800,7501,8495"; a="1396511398"
X-MGA-submission: MDHnLgXuqwR6ATolh24vz1bmOdfqjrl+2cfRqwaptsqXGdoWvzac3NEDg/CaPnn4P/LWpfIGGpRlffhY75tRW6X2p/BCYPN5Z2Uc4RaHougLoKpdsLnsNLYtL1ALj05YnDw0mQXvi23fC72Vab/ZsAHd
Received: from nasanexm01f.na.qualcomm.com ([10.85.0.32]) by Ironmsg04-R.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 11 Apr 2017 11:39:05 -0700
Received: from [10.64.115.66] (10.80.80.8) by NASANEXM01F.na.qualcomm.com (10.85.0.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1178.4; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 11:39:03 -0700
From: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
To: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
CC: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, "mtgvenue@ietf.org" <mtgvenue@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 13:39:01 -0500
Message-ID: <9FB75D90-2E21-4974-BBE1-6C4902266E74@qti.qualcomm.com>
In-Reply-To: <F0B703C9-D549-4E01-AE2A-E1BF442F37F0@gmail.com>
References: <37de22dc-04a4-f868-698e-cf03cd791957@cisco.com> <a1b4fb14-64ec-2848-91e7-faa93ba6e697@labn.net> <cfd7ace5-d834-fb41-57a4-ea11d0126f0f@cisco.com> <10ee5913-87d4-d895-e880-54471b2469a7@labn.net> <759DD927-BEC2-4989-A9F5-46B7DD090B24@qti.qualcomm.com> <4fdf7dea-b565-845e-1e0e-541d88a530e1@labn.net> <1CB0773F-602C-4F45-BBEF-E9708F80032E@qti.qualcomm.com> <9d19e10a-8030-2d79-c587-256e07a7892e@cisco.com> <b4365a4f-f378-2766-26fa-d430e1d80916@labn.net> <c11ca278-3835-743b-c68c-e4dde7c9b0af@cisco.com> <F0B703C9-D549-4E01-AE2A-E1BF442F37F0@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; markup="markdown"
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.6r5347)
X-Originating-IP: [10.80.80.8]
X-ClientProxiedBy: NASANEXM01E.na.qualcomm.com (10.85.0.31) To NASANEXM01F.na.qualcomm.com (10.85.0.32)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/n8u95csPrsNHZYRCeD_XfTr3mEA>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory
X-BeenThere: mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IAOC meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mtgvenue/>
List-Post: <mailto:mtgvenue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 18:39:08 -0000

On 11 Apr 2017, at 13:26, Fred Baker wrote:

> So it's not "let's make enough in meeting X to pay for the loss in 
> meeting Y", it's "let's fund the entire budget".

Between this, Andrew's comment, and Brian's comment, I'm starting to 
hear that "This is not a requirement for meeting selection; it is an 
overall budget requirement". That's starting to sound out of scope for 
the document. Are there objections to removing this item from the 
document entirely?

pr
-- 
Pete Resnick <http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - +1 (858)651-4478

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email