IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Wed, 05 April 2017 16:44 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A93C129480 for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Apr 2017 09:44:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.197
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.796, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (768-bit key) header.d=labn.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z7B6SrkSDKN6 for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Apr 2017 09:44:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gproxy6-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy6-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [67.222.39.168]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E7E44128CFF for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Apr 2017 09:44:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 20970 invoked by uid 0); 5 Apr 2017 16:44:21 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO cmgw2) (10.0.90.83) by gproxy6.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 5 Apr 2017 16:44:21 -0000
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by cmgw2 with id 4gkH1v00l2SSUrH01gkLfH; Wed, 05 Apr 2017 10:44:21 -0600
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=LIwWeNe9 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:17 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10 a=AzvcPWV-tVgA:10 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=olxN1I5xAP_31D4lhCEA:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10 a=w1C3t2QeGrPiZgrLijVG:22
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version :Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=pGc7AQWctp0gfpPjRMZe1NMJvg+HlJfo5Ijt6dyEmn4=; b=zCYRykK8XHerIwUbwnMxNNlPGH iGwRz4KYh0osU6ROsntxz3UpsvFIJi58M/qlIqr5haaAoaNq2xHTRkKo0hqRqdRvxW88XTQkKYMQa ZGsZdSZf37LHwpDslQcHYASwb;
Received: from pool-100-15-84-20.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([100.15.84.20]:33986 helo=[IPv6:::1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1cvo2b-0005ZE-GK; Wed, 05 Apr 2017 10:44:17 -0600
To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>, "mtgvenue@ietf.org" <mtgvenue@ietf.org>
References: <37de22dc-04a4-f868-698e-cf03cd791957@cisco.com> <a1b4fb14-64ec-2848-91e7-faa93ba6e697@labn.net> <cfd7ace5-d834-fb41-57a4-ea11d0126f0f@cisco.com>
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Message-ID: <10ee5913-87d4-d895-e880-54471b2469a7@labn.net>
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2017 12:44:13 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <cfd7ace5-d834-fb41-57a4-ea11d0126f0f@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box313.bluehost.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - labn.net
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source-IP: 100.15.84.20
X-Exim-ID: 1cvo2b-0005ZE-GK
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender: pool-100-15-84-20.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([IPv6:::1]) [100.15.84.20]:33986
X-Source-Auth: lberger@labn.net
X-Email-Count: 2
X-Source-Cap: bGFibm1vYmk7bGFibm1vYmk7Ym94MzEzLmJsdWVob3N0LmNvbQ==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/BLHSFKDR2i6BGzFuSBxqWO-LNrM>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory
X-BeenThere: mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IAOC meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mtgvenue/>
List-Post: <mailto:mtgvenue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2017 16:44:27 -0000

Eliot,

I don't mind being in the minority / the rough, but I think it
reasonable for us to follow rfc2418 in this discussion. 

Lou

On 4/5/2017 12:02 PM, Eliot Lear wrote:
> This one gets removed based on comments in the room.
>
>
> On 4/5/17 5:56 PM, Lou Berger wrote:
>> Eliot/All,
>>
>>
>> On 4/5/2017 9:40 AM, Eliot Lear wrote:
>>> The economics of the Venue allow the meeting to be...
>> Is this going to be moved to a "desired" category? If so, the next
>> comment doesn't apply.
>>
>> If not, was the agreement in the room really that it is okay for the
>> IAOC to select a location that is known well in advance to result in a
>> net loss?
>>
>> Lou
>>  
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mtgvenue mailing list
> Mtgvenue@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email