IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Tue, 11 April 2017 18:12 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA52812EB6D for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 11:12:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.523
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.523 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13o_Tr_W_wQJ for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 11:12:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9342612EB86 for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 11:12:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2272; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1491934350; x=1493143950; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version: in-reply-to; bh=Ig8PiMiZsiyoDauDlyt5irUE5lIsjR/CedR1HX+LXH0=; b=XEns8ROVu1nSC+Bcb1Y6Y+LjiWkK1w83quWbyJWOw+tkyXiICsY4s4Lj Z1Sxx/D0wrRhqNGmAobYX1FFGRdA+FPZL6r8h//YtaIIDFM2+eSF/EbH4 cdShULQE0CJi/WTv7NgJyB4vStVHBe1sXRc2vz3Hfh455mFnblFpKE0k7 0=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 481
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0D8AQClG+1Y/xbLJq1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBiSWKE3OQW5VYgg8Hhh0ChCEYAQIBAQEBAQEBayiFFgEFI2YLDgoqAgJXBgEMCAEBigypM4IminsBAQEBAQEBAwEBAQEBAQESD4hVgmuHXIJfAQScf4N9gg2MVIFnAYh/hl2UAR84gQUlFggYFYcdPooKAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.37,186,1488844800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="651059695"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-3.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Apr 2017 18:12:28 +0000
Received: from [10.61.103.61] (dhcp-10-61-103-61.cisco.com [10.61.103.61]) by aer-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v3BICSA6004911; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 18:12:28 GMT
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>, mtgvenue@ietf.org
References: <a1b4fb14-64ec-2848-91e7-faa93ba6e697@labn.net> <cfd7ace5-d834-fb41-57a4-ea11d0126f0f@cisco.com> <10ee5913-87d4-d895-e880-54471b2469a7@labn.net> <759DD927-BEC2-4989-A9F5-46B7DD090B24@qti.qualcomm.com> <4fdf7dea-b565-845e-1e0e-541d88a530e1@labn.net> <1CB0773F-602C-4F45-BBEF-E9708F80032E@qti.qualcomm.com> <9d19e10a-8030-2d79-c587-256e07a7892e@cisco.com> <b4365a4f-f378-2766-26fa-d430e1d80916@labn.net> <20170411171823.GE2378@mx4.yitter.info> <34f8e5ff-abe9-a8ce-5281-8d3c4b9ce498@labn.net> <20170411180306.GG2378@mx4.yitter.info>
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <095f8774-cd6f-64ca-06ed-8bf7d5d25868@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 20:12:28 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20170411180306.GG2378@mx4.yitter.info>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XloEFR8tO0fDiNbkxuLGfUrwtDB4L0uEA"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/csI9x4qyuEIKV65P-hkEFFIrjyA>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory
X-BeenThere: mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IAOC meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mtgvenue/>
List-Post: <mailto:mtgvenue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 18:12:45 -0000


On 4/11/17 8:03 PM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> What about something along the lines of, "The venue appears to be
> consistent with the bounds of the budget for the meeting"?
>

I don't see a problem with that sort of text, but let me ask this
question: has there ever been a meeting where that WASN'T true?

Eliot

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email