IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Wed, 05 April 2017 14:17 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38577127076 for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Apr 2017 07:17:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ePqhVTMnzjOM for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Apr 2017 07:17:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it0-x242.google.com (mail-it0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0D18128768 for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Apr 2017 07:17:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it0-x242.google.com with SMTP id e75so1502372itd.1 for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Wed, 05 Apr 2017 07:17:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:organization:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=g5b5RoERCsS3Eipq15C+DugxT+FXP5itQy06Vksxazc=; b=ebPr/61HcrPqTmfVfUop6lBM/dLTGx6peq0X1AOZBnlWwcZYNUQ91tBuloAF26lCe0 Ks8yGp2aOG3ggTWObb5w1EwWZCE4/4TQRQGXLpgkzGHoSfOWumtl0cA4/czeExbgJ0R6 CCxQ1bjmmhyL65L823/5TTOAFyvuR8udYaWWdrQa7IGdtjqKZuoQFuAEGSlmOvunKf4z IZ296TXPsb+UUwfxWVuvQJiuR6dLKn9vRk8wtVPsMhgKLBgFV8kkZyGkNZHJoEHhRK28 qrEbGpPO5oRsYiE9EhppCSGm7VRsTKvC294yO85cD/kmTD6TFqU+ra0tlX5YGbvwSeCC cm1g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=g5b5RoERCsS3Eipq15C+DugxT+FXP5itQy06Vksxazc=; b=ZjyO1K42EmREPXijU1fNFlKhFdJ1375kT2zxNfcCqzFLn0LDzw5AESvfFrdg+0gd4H /HW1pf1Le2SRA9O2k31fvHHWa0ZIavJ/aqwW5q4expeHg+w3ADVISTxGsqGLbwiKTx1r llb5i0tByvhXFkGpQifLpuR2plSjoStwtQK6BOvtkdLcqRva11caZn5t9CNn4rOQ9PkQ /0coUY27n/Yc5mNMIr/oebHOTACg3WinjjrXqBQ8pu7EpZolaXn7JoZlwDZlqOi1kMbb Mol3lOhA1PP4yRT/3UFaY9wel7b+HrwCpFPpEf+IK0zQUuXRfPEiKngFkcaU2zp8Zy/s VO4w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H3kTFJVA4ifil1LMyQv8rUouIpgBs68YGj/EELtBBSFxX8qoXNw ccrpmLxXFBhCVyuB
X-Received: by 10.36.95.15 with SMTP id r15mr21157016itb.13.1491401859974; Wed, 05 Apr 2017 07:17:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.11.95] (50-76-68-137-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net. [50.76.68.137]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s194sm8772508ita.12.2017.04.05.07.17.39 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 05 Apr 2017 07:17:39 -0700 (PDT)
To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>, "mtgvenue@ietf.org" <mtgvenue@ietf.org>
References: <37de22dc-04a4-f868-698e-cf03cd791957@cisco.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
Message-ID: <43350e46-1fbd-b1c1-f0d3-440d34cee825@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2017 02:17:42 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <37de22dc-04a4-f868-698e-cf03cd791957@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/JE7pFaXUwE3oEwdOSB_o6ui8cJQ>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory
X-BeenThere: mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IAOC meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mtgvenue/>
List-Post: <mailto:mtgvenue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2017 14:17:43 -0000

On 06/04/2017 01:40, Eliot Lear wrote:
> As mentioned by the chair, I am downgrading requirements based on
> working group discussion, mostly from Mandatory to Important. 

Generally, I agree. One slight concern however:

>   * Overflow Hotels can be placed under contract...
>   * The Venue environs include budget hotels within...

Individually, it seems fine to make these "Important", but
somehow it seems mandatory that there are *in total* enough
hotel rooms close enough to the Facility.

    Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email