Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Wed, 05 April 2017 22:50 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5740312009C for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Apr 2017 15:50:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.002
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=dcrocker.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Nu5SV2KLqAfT for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Apr 2017 15:50:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from simon.songbird.com (simon.songbird.com [72.52.113.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE4721286CA for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Apr 2017 15:50:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.168] (76-218-8-128.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [76.218.8.128]) (authenticated bits=0) by simon.songbird.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id v35MqsBO025641 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 5 Apr 2017 15:52:54 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=dcrocker.net; s=default; t=1491432775; bh=IG77xTlScikf/t6ew3QBHwxgatNsW0hEyIEt0E4sFJo=; h=Subject:To:References:Reply-To:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=B4urqKHjXIu31G2BQO+QtQdgt2gqt8cZXJLzu/LCylnvfAIGairuiHeglEcVOcC6Y pq0blEuqMOOBaW4FzopJ9Y6ARFYbs6hr0A7LSgui8efnk7agmsNB6buu+MrX1Qscnl DuNC2gZQ8o60q7aSlBuHv4aH02eefRt5d0P4wJyM=
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>, mtgvenue@ietf.org
References: <37de22dc-04a4-f868-698e-cf03cd791957@cisco.com> <7add7c4a-032f-6b78-5b5f-861835a64f9a@dcrocker.net> <006325a5-83e7-9295-71a1-67c0125aa7cb@cisco.com> <c57adf52-3db7-5cfc-d301-3135010e17c6@cs.tcd.ie> <CA+9kkMA7iQrMg2y6g5=i96HL3-_8X04BsQjZEhzWe++uZzJvmQ@mail.gmail.com> <20170405201813.GF3439@mx4.yitter.info> <CAHw9_iLp_AbWRK7K+BHU5XuN3kYTsa3hazxRkhpOr2WFpm+PDw@mail.gmail.com> <20170405224355.GA4860@mx4.yitter.info>
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <0a910dc2-a3b3-d027-0ee5-6f761eda1903@dcrocker.net>
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2017 15:50:36 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20170405224355.GA4860@mx4.yitter.info>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/4XzOzW5f9O2nuXP6NroalMtwXnc>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory
X-BeenThere: mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IAOC meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mtgvenue/>
List-Post: <mailto:mtgvenue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2017 22:50:50 -0000

On 4/5/2017 3:43 PM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> If people instead want to have an ordered list of classes in
> descending order of importance, I can buy that as long as the first


Each time you have put that model forward, I've pointed out the human 
factors challenges of applying it.  The simple summary of those 
challenges is that for any interesting list, almost no human does that 
in almost any situation reliably or accurately.

I do not recall seeing you respond this point of practical concern.

d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net