IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Thu, 06 April 2017 04:46 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32C8E1267BB for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Apr 2017 21:46:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.523
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.523 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MIraWJ2sRDm2 for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Apr 2017 21:46:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DC8D128C83 for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Apr 2017 21:46:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2516; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1491453964; x=1492663564; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=zP5qUDv3YHEFXiZWww7LAYSj3zYaIMQjxf/A9bCssMY=; b=MPbGfGff4FUORfiG7JdEF4Zno0QU33YkK/30VykQjWWWkVWbQaybLJgb jc8HnUMt7FDRtNDbKRYDXpvzPix60ZfN1YyK5UJCtMC5jEYflDo+kzi5Y QjAqNCvNmS++rRu5i10JNo7La/ZytzlnhNSdcJeWKOIubYuK+ddLfiBmw 0=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 481
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CIAgDKxuVY/xbLJq1dGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBiSOKEnOQKh+VVYIPhiIChBMYAQIBAQEBAQEBayiFFgEFI1YQCw4KKgICVwYBDAgBAYoKqgqCJopsAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBEQ+IUwmCYodcgl8BBJxwg3yCDYxKgWWIfIZbk3YfOIEFJRYIGBVBhFsdgWU+iUYBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.37,282,1488844800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="650939164"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-2.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 Apr 2017 04:46:01 +0000
Received: from [10.61.218.220] ([10.61.218.220]) by aer-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v364k1S5015894; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 04:46:01 GMT
To: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
References: <37de22dc-04a4-f868-698e-cf03cd791957@cisco.com> <a1b4fb14-64ec-2848-91e7-faa93ba6e697@labn.net> <cfd7ace5-d834-fb41-57a4-ea11d0126f0f@cisco.com> <10ee5913-87d4-d895-e880-54471b2469a7@labn.net> <759DD927-BEC2-4989-A9F5-46B7DD090B24@qti.qualcomm.com> <4fdf7dea-b565-845e-1e0e-541d88a530e1@labn.net> <1CB0773F-602C-4F45-BBEF-E9708F80032E@qti.qualcomm.com>
Cc: "mtgvenue@ietf.org" <mtgvenue@ietf.org>
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <9d19e10a-8030-2d79-c587-256e07a7892e@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2017 06:46:01 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1CB0773F-602C-4F45-BBEF-E9708F80032E@qti.qualcomm.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="j2OSraXbH5Xdo6rkohCEPT25jRVrnKLvP"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/8s9Ytd_ttD_gBOjJLRplaVegYsk>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory
X-BeenThere: mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IAOC meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mtgvenue/>
List-Post: <mailto:mtgvenue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2017 04:46:06 -0000

Hi Lou,

On 4/5/17 11:36 PM, Pete Resnick wrote:
>
>> Specifically, I think it's reasonable to explain on the list  the
>> rational for basically saying the it's okay to plan for a meeting that
>> will operate at a loss discussed.
>
> Yep. Unless Charles or Eliot (or for that matter, anyone else on the
> list who can do so) gets to it first, I'll post a summary of that part
> of the discussion once I get unburied from day-job things.

The basis for that discussion was that the financial model of the IETF
is undergoing change, and that meeting revenue is likely not to be as
important as it once was.  The room did not want the old model codified.

Eliot

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email