IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Tue, 11 April 2017 18:12 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BA3B12EB8B for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 11:12:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (768-bit key) header.d=labn.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f8-sEHSWvpyZ for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 11:12:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gproxy2-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy2-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.18.3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id D27B812EB85 for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 11:11:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 10595 invoked by uid 0); 11 Apr 2017 18:11:59 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO cmgw4) (10.0.90.85) by gproxy2.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 11 Apr 2017 18:11:59 -0000
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by cmgw4 with id 76Bv1v01P2SSUrH016Bync; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 12:11:59 -0600
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=QdwWhoTv c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:17 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10 a=AzvcPWV-tVgA:10 a=uMszt929KAEAJaVNoKgA:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version :Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=6YcdeuEBXOECDDxKEAbpocB4mcnW9d99KFHC5FA85Gc=; b=anBfu9kH+r8ihH4NzF2AdCB3/Z QNl5mPTE3sSDH4BXKm+2KAvTVdJ0IZ4+iubcHPS9FyL08DijMaJJ9gGVKsd4Y+qfNqC4zpdOUtB/3 0vPhleddfO9LKG4at2MMbw1Ty;
Received: from pool-100-15-84-20.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([100.15.84.20]:54864 helo=[IPv6:::1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1cy0Gh-0000Fv-LI for mtgvenue@ietf.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 12:11:55 -0600
To: mtgvenue@ietf.org
References: <a1b4fb14-64ec-2848-91e7-faa93ba6e697@labn.net> <cfd7ace5-d834-fb41-57a4-ea11d0126f0f@cisco.com> <10ee5913-87d4-d895-e880-54471b2469a7@labn.net> <759DD927-BEC2-4989-A9F5-46B7DD090B24@qti.qualcomm.com> <4fdf7dea-b565-845e-1e0e-541d88a530e1@labn.net> <1CB0773F-602C-4F45-BBEF-E9708F80032E@qti.qualcomm.com> <9d19e10a-8030-2d79-c587-256e07a7892e@cisco.com> <b4365a4f-f378-2766-26fa-d430e1d80916@labn.net> <20170411171823.GE2378@mx4.yitter.info> <34f8e5ff-abe9-a8ce-5281-8d3c4b9ce498@labn.net> <20170411180306.GG2378@mx4.yitter.info>
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Message-ID: <07b952c6-856f-faab-2f07-eb56357d8670@labn.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 14:11:53 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20170411180306.GG2378@mx4.yitter.info>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box313.bluehost.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - labn.net
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source-IP: 100.15.84.20
X-Exim-ID: 1cy0Gh-0000Fv-LI
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender: pool-100-15-84-20.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([IPv6:::1]) [100.15.84.20]:54864
X-Source-Auth: lberger@labn.net
X-Email-Count: 3
X-Source-Cap: bGFibm1vYmk7bGFibm1vYmk7Ym94MzEzLmJsdWVob3N0LmNvbQ==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/BFs3QxgD2tNv9i-Ik0-skByJfvQ>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory
X-BeenThere: mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IAOC meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mtgvenue/>
List-Post: <mailto:mtgvenue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 18:12:08 -0000

Sure.  Close enough.

Lou


On 4/11/2017 2:03 PM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 01:40:30PM -0400, Lou Berger wrote:
>> Then these meetings don't operate at a loss, they are covered by
>> sponsorships or other donations.   I guess we need to define net loss -
>> unless you're suggesting that not covering costs in a projected /
>> budgeted fashion is acceptable?
> If we have to define net loss in this case, then we start to try to
> define the financial model underlying the whole matter and I think we
> have a problem.
>
> What about something along the lines of, "The venue appears to be
> consistent with the bounds of the budget for the meeting"?
>
> A
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email