IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Wed, 05 April 2017 22:54 UTC

Return-Path: <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Original-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA4C2129353 for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Apr 2017 15:54:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=yitter.info header.b=fG7SHMNs; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=yitter.info header.b=IqURiGm6
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MAXi4mL7_O50 for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Apr 2017 15:54:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.yitter.info (mx4.yitter.info [159.203.56.111]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE99F1286CA for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Apr 2017 15:54:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23DF6BFB39 for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Apr 2017 22:54:31 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yitter.info; s=default; t=1491432871; bh=lZZLCSR5fmSyZxNz5fVDvRndTwzYcskrVFBRvf48obM=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=fG7SHMNsPmGbTjm7yLiL2boV0MCK0uazc4r/QMyUN2Ci5siz5k4QYo7Nojqijn/fc qcI7EEznSLwiQJDNV3994ool6SBIjPIgt0GhmaHViW7Evpw8rlQ5D9Vhxaw1ZhUWwx vGNv7nSLOWwfQFdG71TKNX9B5zWfCRyi6ulY9+MA=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at crankycanuck.ca
Received: from mx4.yitter.info ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx4.yitter.info [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0FmuEixrFQdB for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Apr 2017 22:54:30 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2017 18:54:27 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yitter.info; s=default; t=1491432869; bh=lZZLCSR5fmSyZxNz5fVDvRndTwzYcskrVFBRvf48obM=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=IqURiGm69q6iP788yWV+W+D7MK6anQnmBt5yh12zXgJfQNsQoe7H3qZlaq3pZJiQL 3kqRYEUok9T1SqP2m+cAcK8Xac2RlRHMMzWFGAINAlMcClITFm99YK6oa1/Mki6eL4 UVYXPUbzHAABh5yynLVeFeiMUbTeldJ9O54K0bas=
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: mtgvenue@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20170405225427.GB4860@mx4.yitter.info>
References: <37de22dc-04a4-f868-698e-cf03cd791957@cisco.com> <7add7c4a-032f-6b78-5b5f-861835a64f9a@dcrocker.net> <006325a5-83e7-9295-71a1-67c0125aa7cb@cisco.com> <c57adf52-3db7-5cfc-d301-3135010e17c6@cs.tcd.ie> <CA+9kkMA7iQrMg2y6g5=i96HL3-_8X04BsQjZEhzWe++uZzJvmQ@mail.gmail.com> <20170405201813.GF3439@mx4.yitter.info> <CAHw9_iLp_AbWRK7K+BHU5XuN3kYTsa3hazxRkhpOr2WFpm+PDw@mail.gmail.com> <20170405224355.GA4860@mx4.yitter.info> <0a910dc2-a3b3-d027-0ee5-6f761eda1903@dcrocker.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <0a910dc2-a3b3-d027-0ee5-6f761eda1903@dcrocker.net>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/I2ERbbl7eFKLWtvIxY92G6lI3Dk>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory
X-BeenThere: mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IAOC meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mtgvenue/>
List-Post: <mailto:mtgvenue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2017 22:54:34 -0000

On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 03:50:36PM -0700, Dave Crocker wrote:

> I do not recall seeing you respond this point of practical concern.

I believe, Dave, that we have already agreed that we disagree about
this, so I don't think I will engage with you on the topic either on
or off the list.

Have a nice day,

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email