Re: [Mtgvenue] issue #3: Too many mandatory

[Dave Crocker <[e-mail]>]

On 4/5/2017 4:02 PM, Pete Resnick wrote:
> The above text says that the WG is to discuss and agree on what goes 
> into three things: policies, selection process, and detailed criteria 
> going forward. I read those as three separate items and not solely about 
> the selection process.


So, there's no constraint on the first clause or the last one?

Since they aren't constrained to the selection process, what else bounds 
their scope?

The charter has no explicit reference except to meeting venue selection 
process -- and there are quite a few such references to exactly and only 
that, and FWIW as I recall, that was intentional -- so I must be missing 
the text that enables considering a wider range of issues.

d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net