IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [weirds] Scope and guiding principles (was Re: I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-dnrd-ap-query-00.txt)

Arturo Servin <aservin@lacnic.net> Fri, 04 May 2012 13:44 UTC

Return-Path: <aservin@lacnic.net>
X-Original-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A258A21F8692 for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 May 2012 06:44:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0qF0OHcPajAt for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 May 2012 06:44:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.lacnic.net.uy (mail.lacnic.net.uy [IPv6:2001:13c7:7001:4000::3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F16EC21F8680 for <weirds@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 May 2012 06:44:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:13c7:7001:5128:94e:ee30:6e4f:a151] (unknown [IPv6:2001:13c7:7001:5128:94e:ee30:6e4f:a151]) by mail.lacnic.net.uy (Postfix) with ESMTP id 840B730846E; Fri, 4 May 2012 10:44:09 -0300 (UYT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Arturo Servin <aservin@lacnic.net>
In-Reply-To: <CBC86177.2C58A%francisco.arias@icann.org>
Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 10:43:58 -0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A242A737-1705-4072-897C-BDA76D68FF2C@lacnic.net>
References: <CBC86177.2C58A%francisco.arias@icann.org>
To: Francisco Arias <francisco.arias@icann.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257)
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-SpamCheck:
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-From: aservin@lacnic.net
Cc: "weirds@ietf.org" <weirds@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [weirds] Scope and guiding principles (was Re: I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-dnrd-ap-query-00.txt)
X-BeenThere: weirds@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "WHOIS-based Extensible Internet Registration Data Service \(WEIRDS\)" <weirds.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/weirds>
List-Post: <mailto:weirds@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 13:44:02 -0000

	As guidelines not written in stone I am ok with them.

	I'll be happier having a SHOULD in the second one but I am not opposed to the current form.

Regards,
as

On 3 May 2012, at 20:56, Francisco Arias wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> Steve and I believe we may benefit by agreeing in a few basic principles
> to guide our work. From this and previous discussions we'd suggest the
> following guiding principles:
> 
> 1. The protocol MUST enable policy options, not dictate them. (We should
> specify all the features that are requested, subject to principle #2
> below, without requiring them to be implemented. What to implement is a
> registry/registrar/policy-maker decision outside of the scope of this
> effort.)
> 
> 2. We MUST only specify features that are already required/implemented by
> registries/registrars. )Other features can be specified later by those
> interested in extensions to the protocol.)
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> __
> 
> Francisco.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> weirds mailing list
> weirds@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/weirds

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email