Re: [weirds] Scope and guiding principles (was Re: I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-dnrd-ap-query-00.txt)

Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca> Fri, 04 May 2012 01:06 UTC

Return-Path: <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
X-Original-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F0E711E808C for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 May 2012 18:06:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.636
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.636 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.037, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x05xD4G9+BlQ for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 May 2012 18:06:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from blues.viagenie.ca (blues.viagenie.ca [66.228.45.110]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9699111E8073 for <weirds@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 May 2012 18:06:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mb.lan (modemcable180.211-203-24.mc.videotron.ca [24.203.211.180]) by blues.viagenie.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3D38E1C282; Thu, 3 May 2012 21:06:03 -0400 (EDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
In-Reply-To: <CBC86177.2C58A%francisco.arias@icann.org>
Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 20:58:11 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <3B6B5369-92BB-4B94-8083-437FD06BE160@viagenie.ca>
References: <CBC86177.2C58A%francisco.arias@icann.org>
To: Francisco Arias <francisco.arias@icann.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257)
Cc: "weirds@ietf.org" <weirds@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [weirds] Scope and guiding principles (was Re: I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-dnrd-ap-query-00.txt)
X-BeenThere: weirds@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "WHOIS-based Extensible Internet Registration Data Service \(WEIRDS\)" <weirds.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/weirds>
List-Post: <mailto:weirds@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 01:06:05 -0000

Le 2012-05-03 à 19:56, Francisco Arias a écrit :

> Hello,
> 
> Steve and I believe we may benefit by agreeing in a few basic principles
> to guide our work. From this and previous discussions we'd suggest the
> following guiding principles:
> 
> 1. The protocol MUST enable policy options, not dictate them. (We should
> specify all the features that are requested, subject to principle #2
> below, without requiring them to be implemented. What to implement is a
> registry/registrar/policy-maker decision outside of the scope of this
> effort.)

that is essentially what Wendy Seltzer said at the mic during last IETF. And it seems appropriate (to me).

> 
> 2. We MUST only specify features that are already required/implemented by
> registries/registrars. )Other features can be specified later by those
> interested in extensions to the protocol.)

over design is often not good.

> 
> Thoughts?
> 

make sense to me.

Marc.

> __
> 
> Francisco.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> weirds mailing list
> weirds@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/weirds