IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [weirds] Scope and guiding principles (was Re: I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-dnrd-ap-query-00.txt)

Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca> Fri, 04 May 2012 13:35 UTC

Return-Path: <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
X-Original-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A3B921F86F6 for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 May 2012 06:35:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.633
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.633 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.034, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bKUpA8Mtagjw for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 May 2012 06:35:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from blues.viagenie.ca (blues.viagenie.ca [66.228.45.110]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18DA221F86E2 for <weirds@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 May 2012 06:35:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mb.lan (modemcable180.211-203-24.mc.videotron.ca [24.203.211.180]) by blues.viagenie.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F27661C273; Fri, 4 May 2012 09:35:46 -0400 (EDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
From: Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
In-Reply-To: <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E00392810E14A@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com>
Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 09:35:45 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <02584138-9673-4466-8DE3-83857C35E9AC@viagenie.ca>
References: <4FA1610E.3050706@abenaki.wabanaki.net> <CBC86177.2C58A%francisco.arias@icann.org> <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E00392810E14A@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257)
Cc: "weirds@ietf.org" <weirds@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [weirds] Scope and guiding principles (was Re: I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-dnrd-ap-query-00.txt)
X-BeenThere: weirds@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "WHOIS-based Extensible Internet Registration Data Service \(WEIRDS\)" <weirds.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/weirds>
List-Post: <mailto:weirds@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 13:35:48 -0000

Le 2012-05-04 à 09:33, Murray S. Kucherawy a écrit :

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: weirds-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:weirds-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Francisco Arias
>> Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2012 4:56 PM
>> To: weirds@ietf.org
>> Subject: [weirds] Scope and guiding principles (was Re: I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-dnrd-ap-query-00.txt)
>> 
>> 1. The protocol MUST enable policy options, not dictate them. (We
>> should specify all the features that are requested, subject to
>> principle #2 below, without requiring them to be implemented. What to
>> implement is a registry/registrar/policy-maker decision outside of the
>> scope of this
>> effort.)
>> 
>> 2. We MUST only specify features that are already required/implemented
>> by registries/registrars. )Other features can be specified later by
>> those interested in extensions to the protocol.)
> 
> These make sense from a specification standpoint.  Where we need to be careful is that if such limitations end up being complete (i.e., no extensions to the current query model are ever implemented), then it still has to have been worthwhile to both clients and servers.

right. the principles put foreword seems fine. However, the devil is in the details… Marc.

> 
> -MSK
> _______________________________________________
> weirds mailing list
> weirds@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/weirds

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email