Re: [weirds] Scope and guiding principles (was Re: I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-dnrd-ap-query-00.txt)

Andy Newton <andy@arin.net> Fri, 04 May 2012 14:54 UTC

Return-Path: <andy@arin.net>
X-Original-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6DE921F85B5 for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 May 2012 07:54:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1CPuQoMKZdVa for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 May 2012 07:54:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp1.arin.net (smtp1.arin.net [IPv6:2001:500:4:13::33]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31A0521F8795 for <weirds@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 May 2012 07:54:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by smtp1.arin.net (Postfix, from userid 323) id C718B164FF2; Fri, 4 May 2012 10:54:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from CHAXCH06.corp.arin.net (chaxch06.corp.arin.net [192.149.252.95]) by smtp1.arin.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76509164FE8; Fri, 4 May 2012 10:54:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from CHAXCH04.corp.arin.net (10.1.30.19) by CHAXCH06.corp.arin.net (192.149.252.95) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.247.3; Fri, 4 May 2012 10:53:57 -0400
Received: from CHAXCH01.corp.arin.net ([169.254.1.210]) by CHAXCH04.corp.arin.net ([10.1.30.19]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Fri, 4 May 2012 10:54:45 -0400
From: Andy Newton <andy@arin.net>
To: Francisco Arias <francisco.arias@icann.org>
Thread-Topic: [weirds] Scope and guiding principles (was Re: I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-dnrd-ap-query-00.txt)
Thread-Index: AQHNKYhec9ONaCxxKkKDPHUQDq3cMJa5+noA
Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 14:54:45 +0000
Message-ID: <DA58E435-FB46-40C9-90B2-EAAF0BE7BF4B@arin.net>
References: <CBC86177.2C58A%francisco.arias@icann.org>
In-Reply-To: <CBC86177.2C58A%francisco.arias@icann.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.1.1.56]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <AB5372E619ACE545B130B05A28450DF4@corp.arin.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "weirds@ietf.org" <weirds@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [weirds] Scope and guiding principles (was Re: I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-dnrd-ap-query-00.txt)
X-BeenThere: weirds@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "WHOIS-based Extensible Internet Registration Data Service \(WEIRDS\)" <weirds.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/weirds>
List-Post: <mailto:weirds@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 14:54:50 -0000

On May 3, 2012, at 7:56 PM, Francisco Arias wrote:

> 1. The protocol MUST enable policy options, not dictate them. (We should
> specify all the features that are requested, subject to principle #2
> below, without requiring them to be implemented. What to implement is a
> registry/registrar/policy-maker decision outside of the scope of this
> effort.)
> 
> 2. We MUST only specify features that are already required/implemented by
> registries/registrars. )Other features can be specified later by those
> interested in extensions to the protocol.)
> 
> Thoughts?

I agree.

-andy