IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [weirds] Scope and guiding principles (was Re: I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-dnrd-ap-query-00.txt)

"John Levine" <johnl@iecc.com> Fri, 04 May 2012 17:19 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48F2521F8620 for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 May 2012 10:19:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.104, BAYES_00=-2.599, HABEAS_ACCREDITED_SOI=-4.3, RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED=-4.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OMoPwZnp6LnM for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 May 2012 10:19:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from leila.iecc.com (leila6.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:4c:6569:6c61]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B83821F861F for <weirds@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 May 2012 10:19:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 95932 invoked from network); 4 May 2012 17:19:52 -0000
Received: from leila.iecc.com (64.57.183.34) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 4 May 2012 17:19:52 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:vbr-info; s=4fa40fb8.xn--i8sz2z.k1205; i=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=WVW+MIXl/FDWdiewWzk9QxKBTJc+15t1eEr+mmKc/8E=; b=AGACUKMPNDOKo4tmbM6AaFgRyWkaMnG7By1qsKTb5CuKw6bS5FDbiGIMBCz+eRuDuu81Vu5Av1YsOknCZzYKaxrRngx2LGzlzV1ZMSnsWArSEg6khbXgphNHMLOQvrKmtMMWAlpniFozRY9Hs3F2bHxeF/SLdcv0gj+TCGquWTs=
VBR-Info: md=iecc.com; mc=all; mv=dwl.spamhaus.org
Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 17:19:30 -0000
Message-ID: <20120504171930.13823.qmail@joyce.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@iecc.com>
To: weirds@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E00392810E14A@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [weirds] Scope and guiding principles (was Re: I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-dnrd-ap-query-00.txt)
X-BeenThere: weirds@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "WHOIS-based Extensible Internet Registration Data Service \(WEIRDS\)" <weirds.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/weirds>
List-Post: <mailto:weirds@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 17:19:54 -0000

>These make sense from a specification standpoint.  Where we need to be careful is that if such
>limitations end up being complete (i.e., no extensions to the current query model are ever
>implemented), then it still has to have been worthwhile to both clients and servers.

If it provides what the current WHOIS is supposed to provide, but with
consistent query syntax and machine parsable results, that would be
plenty worthwhile.

R's,
John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email