IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [weirds] Scope and guiding principles (was Re: I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-dnrd-ap-query-00.txt)

Francisco Arias <francisco.arias@icann.org> Fri, 04 May 2012 18:20 UTC

Return-Path: <francisco.arias@icann.org>
X-Original-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A47121F85B9 for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 May 2012 11:20:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rh+URlBnurCx for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 May 2012 11:20:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EXPFE100-2.exc.icann.org (expfe100-2.exc.icann.org [64.78.22.237]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1344F21F859F for <weirds@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 May 2012 11:20:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org ([64.78.22.232]) by EXPFE100-2.exc.icann.org ([64.78.22.237]) with mapi; Fri, 4 May 2012 11:20:12 -0700
From: Francisco Arias <francisco.arias@icann.org>
To: Peter Koch <pk@DENIC.DE>, "weirds@ietf.org" <weirds@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 11:20:10 -0700
Thread-Topic: [weirds] Scope and guiding principles (was Re: I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-dnrd-ap-query-00.txt)
Thread-Index: Ac0qIost9/0UayptSjO4eo2S0Db5hg==
Message-ID: <CBC96A8A.2C888%francisco.arias@icann.org>
In-Reply-To: <20120504085721.GB4152@x27.adm.denic.de>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.1.120420
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [weirds] Scope and guiding principles (was Re: I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-dnrd-ap-query-00.txt)
X-BeenThere: weirds@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "WHOIS-based Extensible Internet Registration Data Service \(WEIRDS\)" <weirds.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/weirds>
List-Post: <mailto:weirds@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 18:20:13 -0000

On 5/4/12 1:57 AM, "Peter Koch" <pk@DENIC.DE> wrote:


>>2. We MUST only specify features that are already required/implemented by
>>registries/registrars. )Other features can be specified later by those
>>interested in extensions to the protocol.)
>
>Limiting scope makes sense, but where's the threshold? At least one? The
>"majority"?
>Is the ICANN/gTLD world what counts?

At least one.

And to clarify, I'm not proposing to do an inventory of all the registries
and registrars are doing, but if/when someone comes here and says ABC
registry/registrar is doing XYZ.

__

Francisco.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email