Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)

Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu> Mon, 04 January 2010 22:41 UTC

Return-Path: <hartmans@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E30A63A69F4; Mon, 4 Jan 2010 14:41:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.634
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.634 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MgxrD7MLTO1M; Mon, 4 Jan 2010 14:41:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.suchdamage.org (permutation-city.suchdamage.org [69.25.196.28]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F0703A67CF; Mon, 4 Jan 2010 14:41:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org [69.25.196.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "laptop", Issuer "laptop" (not verified)) by mail.suchdamage.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C1F820139; Mon, 4 Jan 2010 17:40:59 -0500 (EST)
Received: by carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (Postfix, from userid 8042) id A98A548F0; Mon, 4 Jan 2010 17:40:52 -0500 (EST)
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
To: Patrik Fältström <paf@cisco.com>
References: <4b33100a.01135e0a.2ab9.ffff8e9b@mx.google.com> <3D3C75174CB95F42AD6BCC56E5555B450204C143@FIESEXC015.nsn-intra.net> <20091223171501.7BAE33A697D@core3.amsl.com> <14093.1261593597@epsilon.noi.kre.to> <14853.1261600779@epsilon.noi.kre.to> <2401.1261648036@epsilon.noi.kre.to> <4b3373d7.02135e0a.241a.fffffb62@mx.google.com> <a123a5d60912241926l6f2255e3kc15d1d21573adeb9@mail.gmail.com> <B67FB114-FDA9-4431-A2E2-6ACF344B2EA7@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2010 17:40:52 -0500
In-Reply-To: <B67FB114-FDA9-4431-A2E2-6ACF344B2EA7@cisco.com> ("Patrik Fältström"'s message of "Mon, 4 Jan 2010 17:57:56 +0100")
Message-ID: <tslpr5p4hor.fsf@mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110009 (No Gnus v0.9) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 04 Jan 2010 14:52:29 -0800
Cc: codec@ietf.org, Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>, iesg@ietf.org, kre@munnari.oz.au, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Should the IETF standardize wideband Internet codec\(s\)? " <codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/codec>
List-Post: <mailto:codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2010 22:41:02 -0000

I've been thinking about the codec issue for a while.  I think it is
really desirable for the IETF to charter this group.  I don't think the
charter should prohibit the working group from selecting some existing
codec nor should it prohibit doing new work in this space.