Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)

Steve Underwood <steveu@coppice.org> Tue, 05 January 2010 12:35 UTC

Return-Path: <steveu@coppice.org>
X-Original-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A4D73A6915 for <codec@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jan 2010 04:35:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R0Mofxbx2vRe for <codec@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jan 2010 04:35:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hanghau.pacific.net.hk (hanghau.pacific.net.hk [202.64.33.147]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83F333A685E for <codec@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Jan 2010 04:35:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from i7.coppice.org (25.176.64.202.dyn.pacific.net.hk [202.64.176.25]) by hanghau.pacific.net.hk with ESMTP id o05CZsJS022740 for <codec@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Jan 2010 20:35:54 +0800
Message-ID: <4B433229.1070607@coppice.org>
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 20:35:53 +0800
From: Steve Underwood <steveu@coppice.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091209 Fedora/3.0-3.fc11 Thunderbird/3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: codec@ietf.org
References: <4b33100a.01135e0a.2ab9.ffff8e9b@mx.google.com> <3D3C75174CB95F42AD6BCC56E5555B450204C143@FIESEXC015.nsn-intra.net> <20091223171501.7BAE33A697D@core3.amsl.com> <14093.1261593597@epsilon.noi.kre.to> <14853.1261600779@epsilon.noi.kre.to> <2401.1261648036@epsilon.noi.kre.to> <4b3373d7.02135e0a.241a.fffffb62@mx.google.com> <a123a5d60912241926l6f2255e3kc15d1d21573adeb9@mail.gmail.com> <B67FB114-FDA9-4431-A2E2-6ACF344B2EA7@cisco.com> <20100104214338.GF16373@besserwisser.org> <oGqsR+8YMplaeFpQv2hxug.md5@lochnagar.gulbrandsen.priv.no>
In-Reply-To: <oGqsR+8YMplaeFpQv2hxug.md5@lochnagar.gulbrandsen.priv.no>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Should the IETF standardize wideband Internet codec\(s\)? " <codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/codec>
List-Post: <mailto:codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 12:35:57 -0000

On 01/05/2010 06:16 PM, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
> Mans Nilsson writes:
>> But we are not running out of proposals for codecs to adapt. Both 
>> CELT and SILK seem reasonable.
>
> Speaking for me as a user, MP3 and AAC are at least worthy of 
> consideration. Someone said on this list that they waste bandwidth, 
> but VoIP's main problem for me as a user is low speech quality, not 
> unacceptable traffic. I hear fine voice quality on 128kbps mp3 radio 
> streams and really fine on 176kbps ogg; I'd like to have that for 
> phone calls.
AAC LD might be a candidate, but AAC, MP3 and Vorbis never will. Their 
algorithmic latency makes them a very poor choice for interactive use.

Steve