Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
Herve Taddei <herve.taddei@huawei.com> Tue, 19 January 2010 14:52 UTC
Return-Path: <herve.taddei@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0498A3A6A7E; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 06:52:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S5D2J+CgOMBZ; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 06:52:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrga04-in.huawei.com (lhrga04-in.huawei.com [195.33.106.149]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B61ED3A6A7A; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 06:52:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lhrga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0KWI00ECE12MIR@lhrga04-in.huawei.com>; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 14:47:11 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from h00900001 ([10.200.70.156]) by lhrga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0KWI007NQ12HBL@lhrga04-in.huawei.com>; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 14:47:10 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 15:47:05 +0100
From: Herve Taddei <herve.taddei@huawei.com>
In-reply-to: <6e9223711001121222w65e1a25ak60758f29c981efd7@mail.gmail.com>
To: 'stephen botzko' <stephen.botzko@gmail.com>, 'IESG IESG' <iesg@ietf.org>, 'IAB IAB' <iab@iab.org>, codec@ietf.org, 'IETF Discussion' <ietf@ietf.org>
Message-id: <6B095E48C70B4099B5F41B9B71904872@china.huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_WT9+B4CbpAbOc6l0cyJEUQ)"
Thread-index: AcqTxQCEKOwXYHZ7R8aBwM5Sk6Y1hwCDOi8w
References: <20091223171501.7BAE33A697D@core3.amsl.com> <13194D66-2110-4CB2-B130-8807BE57488B@cisco.com> <458913681001111218o3b232e4sd785b3c09809fcbc@mail.gmail.com> <4B4C46E0.8020609@iptego.com> <8903A80C339345EA82F3AEB33F708840@your029b8cecfe> <4B4CAB6D.8060109@octasic.com> <6e9223711001121222w65e1a25ak60758f29c981efd7@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Should the IETF standardize wideband Internet codec\(s\)? " <codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/codec>
List-Post: <mailto:codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 14:52:24 -0000
Actually I also like both ideas, either joint body as written by Jean Marc or the proposal made by Xavier "Requirements established first in stage 1 shall be sent for stage 2 to other SDOs". Herve _____ From: codec-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:codec-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of stephen botzko Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 9:22 PM To: Jean-Marc Valin Cc: IESG IESG; IAB IAB; codec@ietf.org; Adrian Farrel; IETF Discussion Subject: Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec) I kind of like the joint body idea. One reason is that it brings the ITU codec characterization/testing strengths into the process. Though it might take a little longer to get going, it could save a lot of time at the end (IMHO). Stephen Botzko Polycom On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin@octasic.com> wrote: Hi Adrian, During the last BoF in Hiroshima, there was a very useful presentation by Yusuke Hiwasaki (SG16-Q10 Associate Rapporteur) about how the ITU-T works (slides at: http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/76/slides/codec-2.pdf). From what I understand, there are two main reasons why the ITU-T cannot take on this work by itself: 1) Membership isn't open like the IETF, but most importantly 2) IPR/licensing issues cannot be discussed during the development period There were two proposed workarounds to these (see slide 15). First a focus group was proposed to allow non-ITU members to discuss. Unfortunately, that solution does not address the IPR issue, nor does it address the fact that ITU focus groups cannot create standards in the first place. So the only alternative that was left was to do a joint body with an IETF WG (similar to the JVT between MPEG and ITU that led to H.264). That means we need an IETF WG that can actually develop codecs to begin with. In general, I think it's really time to get the work going and, as Monty put it, not get into meeting pre-meetings to discuss whether we will hold future meetings. At this point, there is significant interest, there are people willing to do the work and there are even four proposals on the table. Right now, the only concern that has been expressed over this work was about having one more codec that vendors would have to support. I don't think that's a very strong argument considering the existing number of codecs out there and especially the fact that what we are proposing here is to take *four* non-standard codecs and make one standard codec out of them. I can't see how that would be a bad thing. Cheers, Jean-Marc Adrian Farrel wrote: > Stefan, > >> until now other SDOs have failed to produce a widely distributed good >> quality wideband and full-band codec that would be suitable for the >> Internet - especially one that is easily distributable - even though the >> necessary technology has been available for a long time. Further, nothing >> has substantially changed lately to make it likely that other SDOs are >> now >> suddenly willing to or capable of doing that. >> >> The proposal to make IETF CODEC development depend on other SDOs is thus >> not a constructive one and should not be followed. > > Your logic may be flawed. > > Until now the IETF has failed to produce a widely distributed good > quality wideband and full-band codec that would be suitable for the > Internet - especially one that is easily distributable - even though the > necessary technology has been available for a long time. > > But you don't suggest that as a reason not to do the work in the IETF. > > The proposed draft charter does not state that the IETF work should be > gated > on other SDOs nor that the IETF shall not develop a Codec. Rather, it > states > the value of sharing the requirements work developed in the IETF with other > SDOs, and it notes the benefits of listening to other SDOs if they point to > existing Codecs that meet or nearly meet the requirements. > > In the unlikely event that another SDO says "thanks for the requirements we > would like to develop a solution in our SDO" we will need to examine the > feasibility of their proposal and how people can best work on a solution. > There does not seem to be any benefit in developing two Codecs to meet the > same set of requirements. > > As to Xavier's point: I think he is right that the wording in the charter > could be usefully re-ordered so that the consultation is mentioned before > the determination to develop a new solution. > > Cheers, > Adrian > > _______________________________________________ > codec mailing list > codec@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec _______________________________________________ codec mailing list codec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec
- [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec … IESG Secretary
- [codec] Fwd: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio C… Cullen Jennings
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Roni Even
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Robert Elz
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Roni Even
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Steve Underwood
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Koen Vos
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Steve Underwood
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Koen Vos
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Patrik Fältström
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Mans Nilsson
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Brian West
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Sam Hartman
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Brian West
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Richard Shockey
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Patrik Fältström
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Spencer Dawkins
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Steve Underwood
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Richard Shockey
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Steve Underwood
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Brian West
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Joel Jaeggli
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Richard Shockey
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Roni Even
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Gregory Maxwell
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Brian West
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Benjamin M. Schwartz
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Brian West
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Gregory Maxwell
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Dean Willis
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Sam Hartman
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Brian West
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Joel Jaeggli
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Koen Vos
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Benjamin M. Schwartz
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Russ Housley
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Herve Taddei
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Cullen Jennings
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Stephan Wenger
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Joel Jaeggli
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Sam Hartman
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Stephan Wenger
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… John C Klensin
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Herve Taddei
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Christian Hoene
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Herve Taddei
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Michael Ramalho (mramalho)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Russ Housley
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Michael Knappe
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Koen Vos
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Steve Underwood
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Herve Taddei
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Steve Underwood
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Christian Hoene
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Steve Underwood
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Herve Taddei
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Herve Taddei
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… stephane.proust
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Stephan Wenger
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Roni Even
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Koen Vos
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Xavier Marjou
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Monty Montgomery
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Christian Hoene
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Ingemar Johansson S
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Stefan Sayer
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Monty Montgomery
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… stephen botzko
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Monty Montgomery
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… stephen botzko
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Alexander Chemeris
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Christian Hoene
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… stephen botzko
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Roni Even
- Re: [codec] Conferencing and layering Benjamin M. Schwartz
- Re: [codec] Conferencing and layering Brian Rosen
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Russ Housley
- Re: [codec] [IAB] WG Review: Internet Wideband Au… Gregory M. Lebovitz
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Stephan Wenger
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Daniel Petrie
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Roni Even
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Daniel Petrie
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Alexander Chemeris
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… stephane.proust
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Ron
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… John Kostogiannis
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Sjoerd Simons
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Thorvald Natvig
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Roni Even
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… stephane.proust
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Ron
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Herve Taddei
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Ingemar Johansson S
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… jari.hagqvist
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Mans Nilsson
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Monty Montgomery
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Ingemar Johansson S
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Ingemar Johansson S
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Mans Nilsson
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… stephen botzko
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Ingemar Johansson S
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… stephen botzko
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… stephane.proust
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Richard L. Barnes
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… stephen botzko
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Ron
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… stephen botzko
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… stephen botzko