IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)

Mans Nilsson <mansaxel@besserwisser.org> Thu, 21 January 2010 00:03 UTC

Return-Path: <mansaxel@besserwisser.org>
X-Original-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 786F128C0F3; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:03:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dfoPl79Jbp0v; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:03:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from paka.besserwisser.org (paka.besserwisser.org [IPv6:2a01:298:4::43]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E3653A6820; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:03:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from paka.besserwisser.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by paka.besserwisser.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.7) with ESMTP id o0L033fb001854; Thu, 21 Jan 2010 01:03:03 +0100 (CET)
Received: (from mansaxel@localhost) by paka.besserwisser.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.7/Submit) id o0L033vq001853; Thu, 21 Jan 2010 01:03:03 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 01:03:03 +0100
From: Mans Nilsson <mansaxel@besserwisser.org>
To: Ingemar Johansson S <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <20100121000303.GA1250@besserwisser.org>
References: <4b33100a.01135e0a.2ab9.ffff8e9b@mx.google.com> <3D3C75174CB95F42AD6BCC56E5555B450204C143@FIESEXC015.nsn-intra.net> <20091223171501.7BAE33A697D@core3.amsl.com> <14093.1261593597@epsilon.noi.kre.to> <14853.1261600779@epsilon.noi.kre.to> <2401.1261648036@epsilon.noi.kre.to> <4b3373d7.02135e0a.241a.fffffb62@mx.google.com> <a123a5d60912241926l6f2255e3kc15d1d21573adeb9@mail.gmail.com> <B67FB114-FDA9-4431-A2E2-6ACF344B2EA7@cisco.com> <130EBB38279E9847BAAAE0B8F9905F8C02959C6B@esealmw109.eemea.ericsson.se>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <130EBB38279E9847BAAAE0B8F9905F8C02959C6B@esealmw109.eemea.ericsson.se>
X-URL: http://vvv.besserwisser.org
X-Purpose: More of everything NOW!
X-happyness: Life is good.
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05)
Cc: codec@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Should the IETF standardize wideband Internet codec\(s\)? " <codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/codec>
List-Post: <mailto:codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 00:03:14 -0000

Subject: RE: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec) Date: Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 10:09:18PM +0100 Quoting Ingemar Johansson S (ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com):


> So our interpretation of such proposed phased approach is that the WG
> would be explicitely taking a decision to pursue the work if there are
> no standardized codecs out there fullfilling the requirements. 

My interpretation of the situation is that this milestone is in most
peoples rear-view mirror. The available codecs that could be
rubberstamped are all missing some of the desirable qualities, ie
internetability, licensing, sound quality, latency.

-- 
Måns Nilsson     primary/secondary/besserwisser/machina
MN-1334-RIPE                             +46 705 989668
I feel partially hydrogenated!

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email