IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)

Brian West <brian@freeswitch.org> Tue, 05 January 2010 15:07 UTC

Return-Path: <brian@freeswitch.org>
X-Original-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17D5C3A6857 for <codec@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jan 2010 07:07:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gIFSQliVpK6e for <codec@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jan 2010 07:07:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yw0-f196.google.com (mail-yw0-f196.google.com [209.85.211.196]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A85F3A67DB for <codec@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Jan 2010 07:07:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by ywh34 with SMTP id 34so9623402ywh.31 for <codec@ietf.org>; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 07:07:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.101.165.38 with SMTP id s38mr4984703ano.31.1262704038149; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 07:07:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?192.168.1.23? (adsl-71-153-132-97.dsl.tul2ok.sbcglobal.net [71.153.132.97]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 20sm18751964iwn.13.2010.01.05.07.07.12 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 05 Jan 2010 07:07:14 -0800 (PST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Brian West <brian@freeswitch.org>
In-Reply-To: <4B435176.1010701@coppice.org>
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 09:07:10 -0600
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <56AFE176-3877-4BDE-A3FF-59B661968F95@freeswitch.org>
References: <4b33100a.01135e0a.2ab9.ffff8e9b@mx.google.com> <3D3C75174CB95F42AD6BCC56E5555B450204C143@FIESEXC015.nsn-intra.net> <20091223171501.7BAE33A697D@core3.amsl.com> <14093.1261593597@epsilon.noi.kre.to> <14853.1261600779@epsilon.noi.kre.to> <2401.1261648036@epsilon.noi.kre.to> <4b3373d7.02135e0a.241a.fffffb62@mx.google.com> <a123a5d60912241926l6f2255e3kc15d1d21573adeb9@mail.gmail.com> <B67FB114-FDA9-4431-A2E2-6ACF344B2EA7@cisco.com> <20100104214338.GF16373@besserwisser.org> <oGqsR+8YMplaeFpQv2hxug.md5@lochnagar.gulbrandsen.priv.no> <008e01ca8e13$edf96db0$c9ec4910$@us> <4B435176.1010701@coppice.org>
To: Steve Underwood <steveu@coppice.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077)
Cc: codec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Should the IETF standardize wideband Internet codec\(s\)? " <codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/codec>
List-Post: <mailto:codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 15:07:24 -0000

I trust your opinion 100% on this matter!

/b

On Jan 5, 2010, at 8:49 AM, Steve Underwood wrote:

> Not more or less so than narrow band codecs. 48k sample per second 24 bit linear PCM works just fine for FAX, while more narrow band codecs corrupt it. :-)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email