Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)

"Roni Even" <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com> Tue, 05 January 2010 18:11 UTC

Return-Path: <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36CF428C192; Tue, 5 Jan 2010 10:11:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k5fNCSSG8Lml; Tue, 5 Jan 2010 10:11:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-bw0-f223.google.com (mail-bw0-f223.google.com [209.85.218.223]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6714B28C16B; Tue, 5 Jan 2010 10:11:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: by bwz23 with SMTP id 23so10558508bwz.29 for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 10:11:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:cc:references :in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:thread-index:content-language; bh=vJwYXM6ZusM9FCG9DDEblZ9ZK9w8QY4jLCZyDJBfk3E=; b=MRNEDO29RvoBAi99hbn5Pb1UMgUIPncs8JPbS3RqYz0sazcW8D3F48aVRvuLyIPsvA SWhem4buStZqJfVvDMijwk7+BzzBA4mDNTSwke7Uy0Iimu8KGuYX93R7vJWL2ck1n0GU eArZvND10lwKa6FhhpXYM5T71jaamckyGyaSo=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer :thread-index:content-language; b=oCix6GAFmgSE6Q2AneX+SNOR4ffgictDzFX7LQv0HA3WftSEhXigHi+D2lJFbQWExY +XhfM7XzibD2JkiPMZlHVGggeCpm6l444dhNN0foiTuNRJopd7aRGP0Fn38FBVpV8zjS /2N+EYFhpWI5Rh0HuNs2Tagiv+6pJTlr6xT+c=
Received: by 10.204.175.8 with SMTP id v8mr1839993bkz.145.1262715079970; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 10:11:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from windows8d787f9 ([72.14.240.163]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 14sm5610449bwz.9.2010.01.05.10.11.16 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 05 Jan 2010 10:11:18 -0800 (PST)
From: Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
To: 'Richard Shockey' <richard@shockey.us>, 'Sam Hartman' <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>, 'Patrik Fältström' <paf@cisco.com>
References: <4b33100a.01135e0a.2ab9.ffff8e9b@mx.google.com> <3D3C75174CB95F42AD6BCC56E5555B450204C143@FIESEXC015.nsn-intra.net> <20091223171501.7BAE33A697D@core3.amsl.com> <14093.1261593597@epsilon.noi.kre.to> <14853.1261600779@epsilon.noi.kre.to> <2401.1261648036@epsilon.noi.kre.to> <4b3373d7.02135e0a.241a.fffffb62@mx.google.com> <a123a5d60912241926l6f2255e3kc15d1d21573adeb9@mail.gmail.com> <B67FB114-FDA9-4431-A2E2-6ACF344B2EA7@cisco.com> <tslpr5p4hor.fsf@mit.edu> <024e01ca8da8$727e6a70$577b3f50$@us>
In-Reply-To: <024e01ca8da8$727e6a70$577b3f50$@us>
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 20:10:06 +0200
Message-ID: <4b4380c6.0e1abc0a.5a80.ffffcd97@mx.google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-index: AcqNjv6ckAfBEz9ERjKCB/CFy5UCHwAGGRzAACJPH7A=
Content-Language: en-us
Cc: codec@ietf.org, 'Phillip Hallam-Baker' <hallam@gmail.com>, iesg@ietf.org, kre@munnari.oz.au, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Should the IETF standardize wideband Internet codec\(s\)? " <codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/codec>
List-Post: <mailto:codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 18:11:27 -0000

Hi,
I do not think that the IETF should accept any work because people want to
do it, if this is the case a group of people can come and ask to start
working on any idea they have that has some relation to the Internet. IETF
should accept work that is in scope for of the IETF  and for which there is
enough knowledge to evaluate the work by the participants. 

I am also curious about which area should have this WG, I am not sure it is
RAI work, in the past there were discussions if even AVT should be in RAI or
transport.

Roni Even

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Richard Shockey
> Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 3:43 AM
> To: 'Sam Hartman'; 'Patrik Fältström'
> Cc: 'Phillip Hallam-Baker'; codec@ietf.org; iesg@ietf.org;
> kre@munnari.oz.au; ietf@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
> 
> +1 Emphatically
> 
> If people want to do the work, why not let them try.
> 
> If they cannot succeed then shut it down.
> 
> That does bring up the more sensitive subject that the IETF as a whole
> needs
> to consider which is when can it be determined that a WG is not
> succeeding.
> That is a much much longer thread.
> 
> >  -----Original Message-----
> >  From: ietf-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
> >  Of Sam Hartman
> >  Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 5:41 PM
> >  To: Patrik Fältström
> >  Cc: codec@ietf.org; Phillip Hallam-Baker; iesg@ietf.org;
> >  kre@munnari.oz.au; ietf@ietf.org
> >  Subject: Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
> >
> >  I've been thinking about the codec issue for a while.  I think it is
> >  really desirable for the IETF to charter this group.  I don't think
> >  the
> >  charter should prohibit the working group from selecting some
> existing
> >  codec nor should it prohibit doing new work in this space.
> >  _______________________________________________
> >  Ietf mailing list
> >  Ietf@ietf.org
> >  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf