IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)

"Benjamin M. Schwartz" <bmschwar@fas.harvard.edu> Wed, 06 January 2010 23:06 UTC

Return-Path: <bmschwar@fas.harvard.edu>
X-Original-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62EB73A683D; Wed, 6 Jan 2010 15:06:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q5DKQyNDUFb9; Wed, 6 Jan 2010 15:06:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from us19.unix.fas.harvard.edu (us19.unix.fas.harvard.edu [140.247.35.199]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A9853A67D4; Wed, 6 Jan 2010 15:06:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from us19.unix.fas.harvard.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by us19.unix.fas.harvard.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A886AFE07; Wed, 6 Jan 2010 18:06:24 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=fas.harvard.edu; h= message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type; s=mail; bh=Vs5ci5mneZEKyzj 0JVIp3XRh1EhieCQlL6Vyf1A/Egw=; b=VK9tX+hOBLCe29fk7YWpQg6yleKbbq+ WNv/pMdZU8EAhAP4DISeNJ/htxYixs1oyfJIMW2jfq1dOWeUblx7UQsypU3z9poK 6CzWoDa+803Y74dG948po/gVtkkq/oyssvSQoGafHsDQlbK0oSwTCkyGREbidpQM qiLddYUaNYXs=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=simple; d=fas.harvard.edu; h= message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type; q=dns; s=mail; b=dNGgOlJlz gwxxxjJGVkR10HZGqeKSWE/kTRJnnapPLSg4Q17OPQT6eAvZ7CAklzYg4yI+atI5 K8q0zicUzwZnVTGnv+XQbC+pRvFFsN3IpnZv6fmaOnNAMk7tHvzF3bH7xHvr8Lm3 k8e3qqSedfmXmlvJuGkJ9T5p9K0MsDinuk=
Received: from [198.19.166.150] (173-14-236-25-Utah.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.14.236.25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bmschwar@fas) by us19.unix.fas.harvard.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 981BCAFE02; Wed, 6 Jan 2010 18:06:23 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <4B45176D.3060808@fas.harvard.edu>
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2010 18:06:21 -0500
From: "Benjamin M. Schwartz" <bmschwar@fas.harvard.edu>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20091019)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
References: <4b33100a.01135e0a.2ab9.ffff8e9b@mx.google.com> <2401.1261648036@epsilon.noi.kre.to> <4b3373d7.02135e0a.241a.fffffb62@mx.google.com> <a123a5d60912241926l6f2255e3kc15d1d21573adeb9@mail.gmail.com> <B67FB114-FDA9-4431-A2E2-6ACF344B2EA7@cisco.com> <tslpr5p4hor.fsf@mit.edu> <024e01ca8da8$727e6a70$577b3f50$@us> <4b4380c6.0e1abc0a.5a80.ffffcd97@mx.google.com> <4B44119A.6020904@stpeter.im> <4B44154E.6070007@bogus.com> <8c99930d1001061459yacf631dtd8c3498faa1050d5@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <8c99930d1001061459yacf631dtd8c3498faa1050d5@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig06F2235DA1B3E231665B8560"
Cc: iesg@ietf.org, ik Fältström' <paf@cisco.com>, codec@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>
Subject: Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: bens@alum.mit.edu
List-Id: "Should the IETF standardize wideband Internet codec\(s\)? " <codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/codec>
List-Post: <mailto:codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2010 23:06:27 -0000

Andrew G. Malis wrote:
> I appreciate the potential difficulty of guaranteeing the unencumbered
> status of any output of this group. However, I would like this statement to
> be stronger, saying that this group will only produce a new codec if it is
> strongly believed by WG rough consensus to either be unencumbered,
> or freely licensed by the IPR holder(s), if any.

For political reasons, this is unlikely to happen.  Instead, I hope you
will participate in the WG.  Then that rough consensus will depend on your
opinion (roughly).

--Ben

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email