Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)

Koen Vos <koen.vos@skype.net> Fri, 25 December 2009 07:55 UTC

Return-Path: <koen.vos@skype.net>
X-Original-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43D803A68F6; Thu, 24 Dec 2009 23:55:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.185
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.185 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.185]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VkzyK5qifMRA; Thu, 24 Dec 2009 23:55:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.skype.net (mail.skype.net [212.187.172.39]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0A773A682C; Thu, 24 Dec 2009 23:55:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.skype.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.skype.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFE226003D73C; Fri, 25 Dec 2009 07:55:30 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=skype.net; h=message-id :date:from:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=mail; bh=FHHm4dMS1w3w x+1jGAamVlyT3Mk=; b=nxWoPpbwJy0xoDEYKfSKBNRxo2Ec1COxVKAz2kKJyy2Q 8gQnZ1pcIihx3CmJdEpvrujUPGwkVJBH3tOt7Q1GM0JM/v7z4O+6B8H1lxFc536p BPxLCvRYNROptg70igOn994KUasntvdkuuRR6Fw/quRLnOXru02cXyzjNX9ofxg=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=skype.net; h=message-id:date:from :to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=mail; b=E1OX0cc42TYJGyMxnTvB em2H3ElJ+bwba0uoMzZNANSiwEIKNzzhz02p1V/f6AWs+aNP15qsG2s9E2Qr9na8 MMUuQbyDG9RchGgdV+LHRsTTVcJ0bLKgzeZMVPs2GMuk9+CbWz73BB/7SD+gvXsb O6LuuJlC7oIhOJKuhRKKTgk=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.skype.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E37F26003D6F6; Fri, 25 Dec 2009 07:55:30 +0000 (GMT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at dub-mail.skype.net
Received: from mail.skype.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dub-mail.skype.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iIxulsYXMDqW; Fri, 25 Dec 2009 07:55:30 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by mail.skype.net (Postfix, from userid 33) id 2BE2B6003D728; Fri, 25 Dec 2009 07:55:30 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from ip64-75-163-14.hsia.aloha.net (ip64-75-163-14.hsia.aloha.net [64.75.163.14]) by mail.skype.net (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Thu, 24 Dec 2009 23:55:30 -0800
Message-ID: <20091224235530.49092xi81l9bng1e@mail.skype.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 23:55:30 -0800
From: Koen Vos <koen.vos@skype.net>
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
References: <4b33100a.01135e0a.2ab9.ffff8e9b@mx.google.com> <3D3C75174CB95F42AD6BCC56E5555B450204C143@FIESEXC015.nsn-intra.net> <20091223171501.7BAE33A697D@core3.amsl.com> <14093.1261593597@epsilon.noi.kre.to> <14853.1261600779@epsilon.noi.kre.to> <2401.1261648036@epsilon.noi.kre.to> <4b3373d7.02135e0a.241a.fffffb62@mx.google.com> <a123a5d60912241926l6f2255e3kc15d1d21573adeb9@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <a123a5d60912241926l6f2255e3kc15d1d21573adeb9@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.3.4)
Cc: codec@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org, kre@munnari.oz.au, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Should the IETF standardize wideband Internet codec\(s\)? " <codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/codec>
List-Post: <mailto:codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2009 07:55:51 -0000

Quoting Phillip Hallam-Baker:
> MP3 and AC3 are the existing industry standards.

These codecs are rarely used for real-time communications, mostly  
because of their high bitrates/poor quality for voice signals.


> So the most we are going to have is a document that
> brings together all the relevant information and allows people to
> quickly come to a degree of confidence that the technology will be
> inencumbered on a certain date.

Any difference with other standards?

koen.