IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)

Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Tue, 05 January 2010 16:08 UTC

Return-Path: <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Original-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEA983A68D8; Tue, 5 Jan 2010 08:08:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m4O+LGcvjnfb; Tue, 5 Jan 2010 08:08:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [147.28.0.81]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FC933A688D; Tue, 5 Jan 2010 08:08:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.151] (c-98-234-104-156.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [98.234.104.156]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o05G7FIa098975 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 5 Jan 2010 16:07:58 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
Message-ID: <4B4363B3.10502@bogus.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 08:07:15 -0800
From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>
References: <4b33100a.01135e0a.2ab9.ffff8e9b@mx.google.com> <3D3C75174CB95F42AD6BCC56E5555B450204C143@FIESEXC015.nsn-intra.net> <20091223171501.7BAE33A697D@core3.amsl.com> <14093.1261593597@epsilon.noi.kre.to> <14853.1261600779@epsilon.noi.kre.to> <2401.1261648036@epsilon.noi.kre.to> <4b3373d7.02135e0a.241a.fffffb62@mx.google.com> <a123a5d60912241926l6f2255e3kc15d1d21573adeb9@mail.gmail.com> <B67FB114-FDA9-4431-A2E2-6ACF344B2EA7@cisco.com> <20100104214338.GF16373@besserwisser.org> <oGqsR+8YMplaeFpQv2hxug.md5@lochnagar.gulbrandsen.priv.no> <008e01ca8e13$edf96db0$c9ec4910$@us>
In-Reply-To: <008e01ca8e13$edf96db0$c9ec4910$@us>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.2 (nagasaki.bogus.com [147.28.0.81]); Tue, 05 Jan 2010 16:08:00 +0000 (UTC)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 08:09:03 -0800
Cc: ietf@ietf.org, kre@munnari.OZ.AU, codec@ietf.org, 'Patrik Fältström' <paf@cisco.com>, 'Arnt Gulbrandsen' <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>, 'Mans Nilsson' <mansaxel@besserwisser.org>, 'Phillip Hallam-Baker' <hallam@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Should the IETF standardize wideband Internet codec\(s\)? " <codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/codec>
List-Post: <mailto:codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 16:08:35 -0000

Catering to the backwards compatibility needs of qam v.34bis doesn't
seem like a terribly high priority application for a wideband voice
codec... Your user agent can just use g.711 for that application.

Richard Shockey wrote:
> Just as an amusing side bar to the discussion ..you all know that any
> wideband codec kills fax don’t you?
> 
> 
>>  -----Original Message-----
>>  From: ietf-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
>>  Of Arnt Gulbrandsen
>>  Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 5:16 AM
>>  To: codec@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org
>>  Cc: Phillip Hallam-Baker; Mans Nilsson; Patrik Fältström;
>>  kre@munnari.OZ.AU
>>  Subject: Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
>>  
>>  Mans Nilsson writes:
>>  > But we are not running out of proposals for codecs to adapt. Both
>>  CELT
>>  > and SILK seem reasonable.
>>  
>>  Speaking for me as a user, MP3 and AAC are at least worthy of
>>  consideration. Someone said on this list that they waste bandwidth,
>>  but
>>  VoIP's main problem for me as a user is low speech quality, not
>>  unacceptable traffic. I hear fine voice quality on 128kbps mp3 radio
>>  streams and really fine on 176kbps ogg; I'd like to have that for
>>  phone
>>  calls.
>>  
>>  rnt
>>  _______________________________________________
>>  Ietf mailing list
>>  Ietf@ietf.org
>>  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email