Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
stephen botzko <stephen.botzko@gmail.com> Tue, 12 January 2010 20:22 UTC
Return-Path: <stephen.botzko@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD5463A68EA; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 12:22:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5Z6TYtljcSDr; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 12:22:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-bw0-f223.google.com (mail-bw0-f223.google.com [209.85.218.223]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27F083A68C9; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 12:22:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by bwz23 with SMTP id 23so15153156bwz.29 for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 12:22:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=bXX0H62ufc/cKrzuNLeXB0Ek7xIMbbZAcT6knokDxVI=; b=X4aaDy/b3U1AIPsOVU/+6i0HoYGFehb5f9X6JNYqqLogIUZid/rx3xP+bALeSNnZyM e6J6f1UCpUxtKkPx94w6JzrYlAp1006FSC124Z2JnDZp7Z5oDzvLA1Z5RfT/HRhgSs1s nBLBWtZgOy/XdYkCTxFNgjcklukVkZMCbuhto=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=AMmXGgtK7dLmNqCS1XMyXKi3mr7F/y0+MTtP67XKHHk83f5k+eVGN6CTBkWgnVCx6f 1dTxHH8HJCrggjy9cvWSYkFERaGT+koqDm94h+Lrud3VuShsT3wWO4luAIX6/4gR2YQ2 N7HEwB7fNwbtyZWWqDnMFIpGJ4DreOSQid8N8=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.102.161.12 with SMTP id j12mr1763126mue.72.1263327737518; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 12:22:17 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4B4CAB6D.8060109@octasic.com>
References: <20091223171501.7BAE33A697D@core3.amsl.com> <13194D66-2110-4CB2-B130-8807BE57488B@cisco.com> <458913681001111218o3b232e4sd785b3c09809fcbc@mail.gmail.com> <4B4C46E0.8020609@iptego.com> <8903A80C339345EA82F3AEB33F708840@your029b8cecfe> <4B4CAB6D.8060109@octasic.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 15:22:17 -0500
Message-ID: <6e9223711001121222w65e1a25ak60758f29c981efd7@mail.gmail.com>
From: stephen botzko <stephen.botzko@gmail.com>
To: Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin@octasic.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0016364c7151079c20047cfd6931"
Cc: IESG IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, IAB IAB <iab@iab.org>, codec@ietf.org, Adrian Farrel <Adrian.Farrel@huawei.com>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Should the IETF standardize wideband Internet codec\(s\)? " <codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/codec>
List-Post: <mailto:codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 20:22:27 -0000
I kind of like the joint body idea. One reason is that it brings the ITU codec characterization/testing strengths into the process. Though it might take a little longer to get going, it could save a lot of time at the end (IMHO). Stephen Botzko Polycom On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Jean-Marc Valin < jean-marc.valin@octasic.com> wrote: > Hi Adrian, > > During the last BoF in Hiroshima, there was a very useful presentation by > Yusuke Hiwasaki (SG16-Q10 Associate Rapporteur) about how the ITU-T works > (slides at: http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/76/slides/codec-2.pdf). From > what I understand, there are two main reasons why the ITU-T cannot take on > this work by itself: > 1) Membership isn't open like the IETF, but most importantly > 2) IPR/licensing issues cannot be discussed during the development period > > There were two proposed workarounds to these (see slide 15). First a focus > group was proposed to allow non-ITU members to discuss. Unfortunately, that > solution does not address the IPR issue, nor does it address the fact that > ITU focus groups cannot create standards in the first place. So the only > alternative that was left was to do a joint body with an IETF WG (similar > to the JVT between MPEG and ITU that led to H.264). That means we need an > IETF WG that can actually develop codecs to begin with. > > In general, I think it's really time to get the work going and, as Monty > put it, not get into meeting pre-meetings to discuss whether we will hold > future meetings. At this point, there is significant interest, there are > people willing to do the work and there are even four proposals on the > table. Right now, the only concern that has been expressed over this work > was about having one more codec that vendors would have to support. I don't > think that's a very strong argument considering the existing number of > codecs out there and especially the fact that what we are proposing here is > to take *four* non-standard codecs and make one standard codec out of them. > I can't see how that would be a bad thing. > > Cheers, > > Jean-Marc > > > > Adrian Farrel wrote: > > Stefan, > > > >> until now other SDOs have failed to produce a widely distributed good > >> quality wideband and full-band codec that would be suitable for the > >> Internet - especially one that is easily distributable - even though the > >> necessary technology has been available for a long time. Further, > nothing > >> has substantially changed lately to make it likely that other SDOs are > >> now > >> suddenly willing to or capable of doing that. > >> > >> The proposal to make IETF CODEC development depend on other SDOs is thus > >> not a constructive one and should not be followed. > > > > Your logic may be flawed. > > > > Until now the IETF has failed to produce a widely distributed good > > quality wideband and full-band codec that would be suitable for the > > Internet - especially one that is easily distributable - even though the > > necessary technology has been available for a long time. > > > > But you don't suggest that as a reason not to do the work in the IETF. > > > > The proposed draft charter does not state that the IETF work should be > > gated > > on other SDOs nor that the IETF shall not develop a Codec. Rather, it > > states > > the value of sharing the requirements work developed in the IETF with > other > > SDOs, and it notes the benefits of listening to other SDOs if they point > to > > existing Codecs that meet or nearly meet the requirements. > > > > In the unlikely event that another SDO says "thanks for the requirements > we > > would like to develop a solution in our SDO" we will need to examine the > > feasibility of their proposal and how people can best work on a solution. > > There does not seem to be any benefit in developing two Codecs to meet > the > > same set of requirements. > > > > As to Xavier's point: I think he is right that the wording in the charter > > could be usefully re-ordered so that the consultation is mentioned before > > the determination to develop a new solution. > > > > Cheers, > > Adrian > > > > _______________________________________________ > > codec mailing list > > codec@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec > > _______________________________________________ > codec mailing list > codec@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec >
- [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec … IESG Secretary
- [codec] Fwd: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio C… Cullen Jennings
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Roni Even
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Robert Elz
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Roni Even
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Steve Underwood
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Koen Vos
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Steve Underwood
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Koen Vos
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Patrik Fältström
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Mans Nilsson
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Brian West
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Sam Hartman
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Brian West
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Richard Shockey
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Patrik Fältström
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Spencer Dawkins
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Steve Underwood
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Richard Shockey
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Steve Underwood
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Brian West
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Joel Jaeggli
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Richard Shockey
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Roni Even
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Gregory Maxwell
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Brian West
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Benjamin M. Schwartz
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Brian West
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Gregory Maxwell
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Dean Willis
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Sam Hartman
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Brian West
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Joel Jaeggli
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Koen Vos
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Benjamin M. Schwartz
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Russ Housley
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Herve Taddei
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Cullen Jennings
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Stephan Wenger
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Joel Jaeggli
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Sam Hartman
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Stephan Wenger
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… John C Klensin
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Herve Taddei
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Christian Hoene
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Herve Taddei
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Michael Ramalho (mramalho)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Russ Housley
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Michael Knappe
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Koen Vos
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Steve Underwood
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Herve Taddei
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Steve Underwood
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Christian Hoene
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Steve Underwood
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Herve Taddei
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Herve Taddei
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… stephane.proust
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Stephan Wenger
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Roni Even
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Koen Vos
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Xavier Marjou
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Monty Montgomery
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Christian Hoene
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Ingemar Johansson S
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Stefan Sayer
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Monty Montgomery
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… stephen botzko
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Monty Montgomery
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… stephen botzko
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Alexander Chemeris
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Christian Hoene
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… stephen botzko
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Roni Even
- Re: [codec] Conferencing and layering Benjamin M. Schwartz
- Re: [codec] Conferencing and layering Brian Rosen
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Russ Housley
- Re: [codec] [IAB] WG Review: Internet Wideband Au… Gregory M. Lebovitz
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Stephan Wenger
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Daniel Petrie
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Roni Even
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Daniel Petrie
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Alexander Chemeris
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… stephane.proust
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Ron
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… John Kostogiannis
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Sjoerd Simons
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Thorvald Natvig
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Roni Even
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… stephane.proust
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Ron
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Herve Taddei
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Ingemar Johansson S
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… jari.hagqvist
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Mans Nilsson
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Monty Montgomery
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Ingemar Johansson S
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Ingemar Johansson S
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Mans Nilsson
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… stephen botzko
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Ingemar Johansson S
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… stephen botzko
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… stephane.proust
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Richard L. Barnes
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… stephen botzko
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Ron
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… stephen botzko
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Co… stephen botzko