Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)

Koen Vos <koen.vos@skype.net> Sun, 10 January 2010 07:58 UTC

Return-Path: <koen.vos@skype.net>
X-Original-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7A963A68D1 for <codec@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Jan 2010 23:58:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.11
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.11 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-1.11, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xp3P9MODErW1 for <codec@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Jan 2010 23:58:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.skype.net (mail.skype.net [212.187.172.39]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91DD03A6909 for <codec@ietf.org>; Sat, 9 Jan 2010 23:58:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.skype.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.skype.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DE2C6003DF83 for <codec@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 07:57:57 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=skype.net; h=message-id :date:from:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=mail; bh=c5F9VTzHYF0p zvRky50Fg6pyRYs=; b=cA2JgnL/57fRNjJA8FCabOKinu56AR07le1TTmuh2yAy W25CnSxmTcOLJMqsqdmoS7eVHe4GzUbdeT/9r8LY3nH36UOMW5N+qbjuvDiZeWm/ V3QBgwhRhRCF8rCKU7NtWmbrdwa0unCM0UOrJhO/+2RKtu+eTWtgtF71tOLRK5Q=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=skype.net; h=message-id:date:from :to:subject:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=mail; b=T4ZfxKAezA470t+vCvNJ 2CPIO4E1f0lNvfMkh7wZ3h37EXjun8ECM8BBFY6hvlQDQ2LzQQPzi2s/J3IcTevP aIGpP+iNaCMblSJ61Vpr1brrMkL/ReYAqlB0j8ZcvBuGL26ZsUDf1YKNqD/vylYP EgiOhTrNIf3T2weEqw8QVYk=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.skype.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B1C76002B28F for <codec@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 07:57:57 +0000 (GMT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at dub-mail.skype.net
Received: from mail.skype.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dub-mail.skype.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BKKWGgDYa9Hw for <codec@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 07:57:56 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by mail.skype.net (Postfix, from userid 33) id C95B96003DC30; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 07:57:56 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from 71.141.133.171 ([71.141.133.171]) by mail.skype.net (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Sat, 09 Jan 2010 23:57:56 -0800
Message-ID: <20100109235756.155263tc2ouoz91g@mail.skype.net>
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2010 23:57:56 -0800
From: Koen Vos <koen.vos@skype.net>
To: codec@ietf.org
References: <20091223171501.7BAE33A697D@core3.amsl.com> <13194D66-2110-4CB2-B130-8807BE57488B@cisco.com> <33DF19C647F246D79ED9F9CAAAEE0239@china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <33DF19C647F246D79ED9F9CAAAEE0239@china.huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.3.4)
Subject: Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Should the IETF standardize wideband Internet codec\(s\)? " <codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/codec>
List-Post: <mailto:codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 07:58:01 -0000

Quoting Herve Taddei:

> [] some existing standard codecs (at least G.711, G.722) are already  
> optimized for interactive Internet applications, []

How can these codecs be optimized if their bitrates are many times  
higher than state-of-the-art codecs?  You don't think bitrates matter  
for interactive Internet applications?  I can assure you they do (for  
congested/shared networks, WiFi/3G, conferences, video calling,  
dial-up, etc).

koen