IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [79all] IETF Badge

Henk Uijterwaal <henk@ripe.net> Thu, 11 November 2010 14:16 UTC

Return-Path: <henk@ripe.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 670613A6953 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 06:16:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.578
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.578 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.021, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zG0mp9T2ty4d for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 06:16:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from postgirl.ripe.net (postgirl.ipv6.ripe.net [IPv6:2001:610:240:11::c100:1342]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DDD93A694E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 06:16:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dodo.ripe.net ([193.0.23.4]) by postgirl.ripe.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <henk@ripe.net>) id 1PGXxj-00044c-KW for ietf@ietf.org; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 15:17:21 +0100
Received: from [193.0.21.124] (helo=dhcp-4418.meeting.ietf.org) by dodo.ripe.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <henk@ripe.net>) id 1PGXxj-00076O-0M for ietf@ietf.org; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 15:17:15 +0100
Message-ID: <4CDBFAE7.6030800@ripe.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 15:17:11 +0100
From: Henk Uijterwaal <henk@ripe.net>
Organization: RIPE NCC
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [79all] IETF Badge
References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1011090344110.46514@fledge.watson.org> <CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B2202288A0B@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com> <4CDBCD06.2020108@dcrocker.net>
In-Reply-To: <4CDBCD06.2020108@dcrocker.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-RIPE-Signature: e0cdef1f45f89a40ad608d255b27e7d5da082a4eb68e3461559430edb857ca69
X-RIPE-Spam-Level: --
X-RIPE-Signature: e0cdef1f45f89a40ad608d255b27e7d5da082a4eb68e3461559430edb857ca69
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 14:16:54 -0000

On 11/11/2010 12:01, Dave CROCKER wrote:

> It is a change in practice.  It is not a change in formal requirement.
> This has (always?) been an unenforced requirement.(*)

No, I've been refused entry to the terminal room at least once because I did
not wear my badge.  In some venues (Maastricht, Paris, and maybe others)
a badge was needed to enter the building early in the morning or late in
the evening.

Henk


-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Henk Uijterwaal                           Email: henk.uijterwaal(at)ripe.net
RIPE Network Coordination Centre          http://www.xs4all.nl/~henku
P.O.Box 10096          Singel 258         Phone: +31.20.5354414
1001 EB Amsterdam      1016 AB Amsterdam  Fax: +31.20.5354445
The Netherlands        The Netherlands    Mobile: +31.6.55861746
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I confirm today what I denied yesterday.            Anonymous Politician.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email