Re: [79all] IETF Badge

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Fri, 12 November 2010 00:56 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD1333A682D; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 16:56:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.558
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.558 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.041, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H57xmIr+5AR7; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 16:56:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stpeter.im (stpeter.im [207.210.219.233]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC1353A67FB; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 16:56:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp-73e4.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-73e4.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.115.228]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 69B3540BB9; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 18:06:43 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <4CDC90E9.50903@stpeter.im>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 08:57:13 +0800
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [79all] IETF Badge
References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1011090344110.46514@fledge.watson.org> <Pine.GSO.4.63.1011110103450.3692@pita.cisco.com> <4CDBC1A1.7020500@stpeter.im> <Pine.GSO.4.63.1011110330360.9937@pita.cisco.com>, <4CDBD971.5080303@stpeter.im> <CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B2202288A0F@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com> <4CDC1BDC.9090701@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <4CDC1BDC.9090701@cisco.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
OpenPGP: url=http://www.saint-andre.com/me/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms040200030703050608010408"
Cc: "iaoc@ietf.org" <iaoc@ietf.org>, Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com>, Samuel Weiler <weiler+ietf@watson.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 00:56:47 -0000

On 11/12/10 12:37 AM, Eliot Lear wrote:

> Is there is an unspoken concern in this discussion as to whether the
> host wanted to take names based on what people were saying, in the case
> they said something "objectionable"?

There might be many unspoken objections, e.g. that a certain kind of
host might want to keep random locals out of what could be perceived as
a free speech zone.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/