RE: [79all] IETF Badge
Xiangsong Cui <Xiangsong.Cui@huawei.com> Mon, 15 November 2010 02:29 UTC
Return-Path: <Xiangsong.Cui@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73B1C3A6A27 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Nov 2010 18:29:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.129
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.129 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.366, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PnsUkRYxCRLD for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Nov 2010 18:29:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com (unknown [119.145.14.67]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F6E03A6A20 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Nov 2010 18:29:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (szxga04-in [172.24.2.12]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LBW00660MYSQC@szxga04-in.huawei.com> for ietf@ietf.org; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 10:30:28 +0800 (CST)
Received: from c00111037 ([10.111.16.128]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0LBW00IWKMYROP@szxga04-in.huawei.com> for ietf@ietf.org; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 10:30:28 +0800 (CST)
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 10:30:26 +0800
From: Xiangsong Cui <Xiangsong.Cui@huawei.com>
Subject: RE: [79all] IETF Badge
In-reply-to: <4CE06071.8000805@labn.net>
To: 'Lou Berger' <lberger@labn.net>
Message-id: <082301cb846d$107e1070$317a3150$%cui@huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-language: zh-cn
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Thread-index: AcuESgScMU3m5VlKSJqcQDfeIjV5HAAH/FiA
References: <1106719229.799545.1289526328086.JavaMail.root@sz0152a.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net> <Pine.GSO.4.63.1011112007060.12026@pita.cisco.com> <201011122308.oACN89K1013100@sj-core-1.cisco.com> <Pine.GSO.4.63.1011121616000.12606@pita.cisco.com> <fdd5875b1cd04.1cd04fdd5875b@huawei.com> <4CE06071.8000805@labn.net>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 02:29:59 -0000
Hey, Don't misunderstand me, although I'm telling a fantastic idea. > Maybe I'm just old fashioned, at least from an IETF perspective, but why > not just let them "drop in", i.e. attend the meeting without a badge? I didn't say attending without a badge, I just said some guest may attend IETF meeting wearing GUEST BADGE. Notice "the applicant should explain why he/she should be issued the guest badge there" in my message. > I've always felt this served the community well and is not really > different from our mailing list subscription policy. (I hope no one > proposes to start charging for that, but if you take the current > trend/discussion a few steps farther, that's where we may end up!) I didn't oppose charging for meeting, I just suggest we may allow a few guest to attend IETF meeting (without fee) and myself would like to pay the normal meeting fees. For example, if IETF chair (or WG chair) wants to invite somebody to give IETF community (or specific WG) some speaking during the meeting week (maybe like Thursday speaking or some others), should the invited guy also register and pay the money for the speaking? Maybe HE/SHE doesn't attend any other IETF meeting. So here I just said, there MAY be the possibility that Guest can attend the meeting, I didn't say there MUST some guys who can attend IETF without fee payment. > > Lou > > BTW There was one IETF, perhaps Columbus, where I attended just one day > and I still paid the full amount. Although, it cost a bit less, back > then. IMO contributors will "do the right thing", and we should make it > easy to be a lurker as they may turn into a direct or indirect contributor. You did contribute to IETF community, maybe some other friends paid full fee but didn't go to the meeting, they even didn't get any IETF service (network, beverage, etc.). All of you deserve my respect. Regards, Xiangsong
- Re: [79all] IETF Badge mstjohns
- Re: [79all] IETF Badge Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [79all] IETF Badge Samuel Weiler
- Re: [79all] IETF Badge Peter Saint-Andre
- RE: [79all] IETF Badge Worley, Dale R (Dale)
- Re: [79all] IETF Badge Dave CROCKER
- Re: [79all] IETF Badge Joel Jaeggli
- Re: [79all] IETF Badge Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [79all] IETF Badge Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [79all] IETF Badge Samuel Weiler
- Re: [79all] IETF Badge Henk Uijterwaal
- Re: [79all] IETF Badge Henk Uijterwaal
- RE: [79all] IETF Badge Worley, Dale R (Dale)
- Re: [79all] IETF Badge Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [79all] IETF Badge Dave CROCKER
- Re: [79all] IETF Badge Dave CROCKER
- Re: [79all] IETF Badge Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [79all] IETF Badge Eliot Lear
- Re: [79all] IETF Badge Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [79all] IETF Badge Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [79all] IETF Badge Andrew Allen
- Re: [79all] IETF Badge Doug Ewell
- Re: [79all] IETF Badge Martin Rex
- Re: [79all] IETF Badge SM
- Re: [79all] IETF Badge Jaap Akkerhuis
- Re: [79all] IETF Badge Scott Brim
- Re: [79all] IETF Badge Lawrence Conroy
- Re: [79all] IETF Badge Dave CROCKER
- Badges and blue sheets Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [79all] IETF Badge Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [79all] IETF Badge Ray Pelletier
- Re: [79all] IETF Badge Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [79all] IETF Badge Andrew Allen
- Re: [79all] IETF Badge Marshall Eubanks
- Re: [79all] IETF Badge Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: Badges and blue sheets JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [79all] IETF Badge Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [IAOC] Badges and blue sheets Marshall Eubanks
- Re: [79all] IETF Badge Scott Brim
- Re: [IAOC] Badges and blue sheets JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- [79all] IETF Badge Scott O. Bradner
- Re: [79all] IETF Badge James M. Polk
- Re: [79all] IETF Badge Scott O. Bradner
- Re: [79all] IETF Badge Randall Gellens
- Re: Badges and blue sheets Tobias Gondrom
- Re: [79all] IETF Badge Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [79all] IETF Badge Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [79all] IETF Badge Bjoern A. Zeeb
- Re: [79all] IETF Badge Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [IAOC] [79all] IETF Badge Eric Burger
- Re: [IAOC] [79all] IETF Badge Eliot Lear
- Re: [79all] IETF Badge Michael StJohns
- Re: [79all] IETF Badge Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [79all] IETF Badge Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [79all] IETF Badge Xiangsong Cui
- Re: [79all] IETF Badge Lou Berger
- Re: [79all] IETF Badge Stephen Farrell
- Re: [79all] IETF Badge Lawrence Conroy
- RE: [79all] IETF Badge Xiangsong Cui
- Re: [79all] IETF Badge Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [79all] IETF Badge Lou Berger
- Re: [79all] IETF Badge Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [79all] IETF Badge Lou Berger
- Re: [79all] IETF Badge Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [79all] IETF Badge Lou Berger
- Re: [79all] IETF Badge Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [79all] IETF Badge Bob Hinden
- Re: [79all] IETF Badge Patrik Faltstrom (pfaltstr)