Re: [79all] IETF Badge

Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com> Mon, 15 November 2010 19:44 UTC

Return-Path: <ole@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA2403A6D11 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 11:44:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.564
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.564 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.035, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1ATNY4OKuPi0 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 11:44:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sj-iport-1.cisco.com (sj-iport-1.cisco.com [171.71.176.70]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E642728C190 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 11:44:32 -0800 (PST)
Authentication-Results: sj-iport-1.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAIoc4UyrRN+K/2dsb2JhbACiXHGkSII+DQGYS4MLgj8EhFqBKoQISw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,201,1288569600"; d="scan'208";a="381358988"
Received: from sj-core-4.cisco.com ([171.68.223.138]) by sj-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 15 Nov 2010 19:45:14 +0000
Received: from pita.cisco.com (pita.cisco.com [171.71.177.199]) by sj-core-4.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oAFJjE68011302; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 19:45:14 GMT
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 11:44:40 -0800 (PST)
From: Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Subject: Re: [79all] IETF Badge
In-Reply-To: <4CE133DC.30209@labn.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.63.1011151142270.8067@pita.cisco.com>
References: <1106719229.799545.1289526328086.JavaMail.root@sz0152a.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net> <Pine.GSO.4.63.1011112007060.12026@pita.cisco.com> <201011122308.oACN89K1013100@sj-core-1.cisco.com> <Pine.GSO.4.63.1011121616000.12606@pita.cisco.com> <fdd5875b1cd04.1cd04fdd5875b@huawei.com> <4CE06071.8000805@labn.net> <082301cb846d$107e1070$317a3150$%cui@huawei.com> <4CE133DC.30209@labn.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com>
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 19:44:39 -0000

On Mon, 15 Nov 2010, Lou Berger wrote:

> Xiangsong,
> 	I suspect you may have misunderstood me.  I'm endorsing the old
> practice of letting in (to meetings) any who wish *without* payment or badge.
> Sure they won't be able to go into the terminal room, but that isn't a
> significant issue.  Them eating the snacks could possibly turn into an issue,
> but it hasn't to date.
> 
> Lou

I am sure this happens already to some extent and I don't think it's 
an issue (having a guest speaker, someone who wants to find out about 
a specific working group, whatever...). So long as this does not turn 
into a way to abuse the system, I don't think anyone is suggesting TSA
style security at our meetings.

Ole


Ole J. Jacobsen 
Editor and Publisher,  The Internet Protocol Journal
Cisco Systems
Tel: +1 408-527-8972   Mobile: +1 415-370-4628
E-mail: ole@cisco.com  URL: http://www.cisco.com/ipj