Re: Appointment of a Transport Area Director

Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu> Mon, 04 March 2013 15:37 UTC

Return-Path: <hartmans@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EEE421F8994; Mon, 4 Mar 2013 07:37:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.669
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.669 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.930, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2BnAqx0H0+nQ; Mon, 4 Mar 2013 07:37:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.painless-security.com (mail.painless-security.com [23.30.188.241]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C34321F898B; Mon, 4 Mar 2013 07:37:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (c-98-216-0-82.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [98.216.0.82]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "laptop", Issuer "laptop" (not verified)) by mail.painless-security.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4901F20229; Mon, 4 Mar 2013 10:37:07 -0500 (EST)
Received: by carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (Postfix, from userid 8042) id DE9C64486; Mon, 4 Mar 2013 10:37:10 -0500 (EST)
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
To: Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Appointment of a Transport Area Director
References: <21B86E13-B8DA-4119-BBB1-B5EE6D2B5C1D@ietf.org> <51330179.3040500@gmail.com> <919840EE-BEC8-4F82-8D3C-B116698A4262@gmx.net> <51335D71.1000506@gmail.com> <5134B110.9040807@cisco.com> <CAHBDyN7-rw8QQ50wYkti9BY_E=12s2Gm37ZMR_tnBqgTksUMPA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2013 10:37:10 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CAHBDyN7-rw8QQ50wYkti9BY_E=12s2Gm37ZMR_tnBqgTksUMPA@mail.gmail.com> (Mary Barnes's message of "Mon, 4 Mar 2013 09:18:07 -0600")
Message-ID: <tsl8v63p461.fsf@mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110009 (No Gnus v0.9) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: IETF Chair <chair@ietf.org>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>, stbryant@cisco.com
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2013 15:37:13 -0000

I think tasking the IESG to look at how to reduce the time commitment
would be an incredibly good idea.  I'd feel a lot more comfortable with
the community giving the IESG clear guidance that we'd like them to
solve that problem than with the community trying to come up with the
solution.

That said, note that there are a number of AD candidates who do take
explicit advantage of the full-time nature of the job.  They get
involved in IETF tools development, coordination between the IETF and
other organizations, process reform, unstucking major issues that need
to be unstuck.
That's all great, but it does all take time.

I'd like to  live in an IETF where we have room for people who do want
to spend a lot of time on all those issues as well as a place where ADs
can take responsibility for the technical work in their area  and
minimize time commitments.

I think the balance between personal review and trusting others is
something that will shift both for individual ADs and over time.  I'd
hate to see the community over-constrain that.