Re: Appointment of a Transport Area Director

Martin Stiemerling <martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu> Sun, 10 March 2013 12:33 UTC

Return-Path: <Martin.Stiemerling@neclab.eu>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B76E021F87D6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 05:33:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.124
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.124 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.517, BAYES_00=-2.599, DATE_IN_PAST_12_24=0.992, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NneqNTPDxbgu for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 05:33:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailer1.neclab.eu (mailer1.neclab.eu [195.37.70.40]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6838F21F870C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 05:33:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailer1.neclab.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72DEB103657; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 13:33:21 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Amavisd on Debian GNU/Linux (netlab.nec.de)
Received: from mailer1.neclab.eu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (atlas-a.office.hd [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qulEcZ9zEMUA; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 13:33:21 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ENCELADUS.office.hd (enceladus.office.hd [192.168.24.52]) by mailer1.neclab.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 554EC1035B3; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 13:33:06 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.7.0.105] (10.7.0.105) by skoll.office.hd (192.168.125.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 13:31:52 +0100
Message-ID: <513B311D.60008@neclab.eu>
Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2013 13:54:53 +0100
From: Martin Stiemerling <martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130221 Thunderbird/17.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
Subject: Re: Appointment of a Transport Area Director
References: <21B86E13-B8DA-4119-BBB1-B5EE6D2B5C1D@ietf.org> <3CB8992B-212A-4776-95FE-71CA1E382FFF@standardstrack.com> <513376DB.7000200@dcrocker.net> <E22ACC99-B465-4769-8B59-BB98A7BA93DF@gmx.net> <79E77523-3D92-4CE9-8689-483D416794EF@standardstrack.com> <D4D47BCFFE5A004F95D707546AC0D7E91F780D2F@SACEXCMBX01-PRD.hq.netapp.com> <071C6ED7-352C-4E74-A483-F5E7A3270FA5@gmail.com> <C726E531-57DC-4C42-9053-1394983126D6@vigilsec.com> <5134D5A0.4050209@gmail.com> <tsllia3m5lh.fsf@mit.edu> <5134F720.5010507@cisco.com> <tsl1ubvlywt.fsf@mit.edu> <CAHBDyN6AM-_b2HMrmmQQVuhxFc-_Rfpfg0=r38mkcJ4zqoJeTw@mail.gmail.com> <tslr4julxmh.fsf@mit.edu> <1C1C0842-BF6A-4A3F-A312-35CF0A994793@lilacglade.org> <BDCCFB12-1F2C-44BD-867A-92E5745F3D39@vigilsec.com> <7B6FDB89-F360-45B6-8240-F2F9F81ABAA7@vigilsec.com> <9292FB65-9842-4C95-9284-15F1E9ECEE1D@lilacglade.org> <5138AE1F.5080602@neclab.eu> <tsl6213p67w.fsf@mit.edu> <5139AC56.5070208@neclab.eu> <tsla9qejc1r.fsf@mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <tsla9qejc1r.fsf@mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [10.7.0.105]
Cc: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 12:33:23 -0000

On 03/08/2013 01:44 PM, Sam Hartman wrote:
>> Can you point out what is unclear?
>
> margaret asked Russ whether we were talking about the future of the area
> or n whether we were talking about requirements/expertise nomcom should
> use for this year.  After reading your message I still don't understand
> which it is.

Here is the clarification:

The 'Open Mic about "Area Expectations for the TSV ADs"' part in the 
TSVAREA session has been put in place by the Transport ADs with the 
intention to let the community discuss the requirements of the Transport 
AD positions.

The discussion of the requirements is for the future, not about the 
current NOMCOM process.

We did notice that there issues with finding Transport ADs just from the 
publicly available information, i.e., two calls for candidates after the 
first, regular call.

Neither of us (IESG nor community) does know about the internals of the 
NOMCOM. And there is no intention to interfere with the NOMCOM process.


  Martin