Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists

Hector Santos <hsantos@isdg.net> Fri, 11 April 2014 21:24 UTC

Return-Path: <hsantos@isdg.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E4A01A02FA for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 14:24:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dYDWIy_fS32i for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 14:24:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dkim.winserver.com (secure.winserver.com [208.247.131.9]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 860821A01DF for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 14:24:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; d=isdg.net; s=tms1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/relaxed; l=646; t=1397251461; h=Received:Received: Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:Organization:To:Subject: List-ID; bh=tigj72rGYoBRpfqUcZ1t/z0IxxQ=; b=vY16rP2Qa1UetJ4rtI31 JXh/zpJ67OoGLFTDkf+x8JROQK8/Ob3xHtN4XDQs5HT6DDa5Kc7etFW2S1WsYf1b Mj07x4bwFesyWJfqsF0W2lzbzyP/tKEIZOVRJRpMVYj5mUkmcf2c3hA8vEuYagNZ GTFwBfdIVB+ia0ABgUiQJH4=
Received: by winserver.com (Wildcat! SMTP Router v7.0.454.4) for ietf@ietf.org; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 17:24:21 -0400
Authentication-Results: dkim.winserver.com; dkim=pass header.d=beta.winserver.com header.s=tms1 header.i=beta.winserver.com; adsp=pass policy=all author.d=isdg.net asl.d=beta.winserver.com;
Received: from opensite.winserver.com (beta.winserver.com [208.247.131.23]) by winserver.com (Wildcat! SMTP v7.0.454.4) with ESMTP id 360042055.4781.3232; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 17:24:21 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; d=beta.winserver.com; s=tms1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/relaxed; l=646; t=1397251399; h=Received:Received: Message-ID:Date:From:Organization:To:Subject:List-ID; bh=pGbjsxY C/rDAiRz1BnwtVOrIgqLgCEIroypMOJivkts=; b=UShQfkbSYd1dFeX2ydIAbRQ dbzeJNtGf0iGQRXlPs12V6Ii3ppMslYG8TkFiYr5QzXCHfafN3/3JdjIX94YFHc9 TbpWxFwqDxoEaDyFm9wWWyyfn78uW4YQp8pDiGaRqqtZPOcbOlzRQjCt9dGAGnVc B1/ScfTsMhLk8735fSV8=
Received: by beta.winserver.com (Wildcat! SMTP Router v7.0.454.4) for ietf@ietf.org; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 17:23:19 -0400
Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([99.121.4.27]) by beta.winserver.com (Wildcat! SMTP v7.0.454.4) with ESMTP id 379575625.9.4492; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 17:23:18 -0400
Message-ID: <53485D86.6000207@isdg.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 17:24:22 -0400
From: Hector Santos <hsantos@isdg.net>
Organization: Santronics Software, Inc.
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
References: <robbat2-20140408T031810-279861577Z@orbis-terrarum.net> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1404072357400.73388@joyce.lan> <01P6EEIPML6600004W@mauve.mrochek.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20140408101346.0ccb5e88@resistor.net> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1404081325130.76892@joyce.lan> <5347C698.6040108@tana.it>
In-Reply-To: <5347C698.6040108@tana.it>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/W_W47dnuRWjggXNQrkq7O1bqBY0
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 21:24:39 -0000

Wouldn't that be tampering with a domain and telecommunications that 
would be valid for all other purposes other than for DMARC?

-- 
HLS

On 4/11/2014 6:40 AM, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
> On Tue 08/Apr/2014 19:34:35 +0200 John R Levine wrote:
>>
>> Just today I did modify it so that any list mail with a From: address
>> @yahoo.com is re written to @yahoo.com.INVALID.  That's the least
>> intrusive way I've been able to come up with to mitigate the damage.
>
> Fair enough.  I've copied that suggestion to
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DMARC#Human_policy
> Please feel free to amend that page at your leisure.
>
> Ale
>
>
>