Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists

S Moonesamy <> Tue, 15 April 2014 17:27 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED7571A06D1 for <>; Tue, 15 Apr 2014 10:27:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.062
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.062 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.272, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pntvhxtaJZEj for <>; Tue, 15 Apr 2014 10:27:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0C401A063C for <>; Tue, 15 Apr 2014 10:27:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ([]) (authenticated bits=0) by (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s3FHQp9f017010 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 15 Apr 2014 10:27:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple;; s=mail2010; t=1397582823; bh=UbGgOTwoj2rzeI5dGuc/X5Rc6k/yp7PAufBjnmWz83I=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=ovCwX22dyDkMVuAniGWpvUBIAl1bKaCZUnKhgUjwsZKGCgV1C5XupoyahE66pvqqH W2g67tOWflYBn6AvYkfVMnnePonoU04XU2WCTMKLkPWC0mdS2pfvoRavtzq1pOrRWP Ebmztjdw9+MV5N/zQomb6p1yMlkZH5kObsMmbzEU=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple;; s=mail; t=1397582823;; bh=UbGgOTwoj2rzeI5dGuc/X5Rc6k/yp7PAufBjnmWz83I=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=BXeCVW1gxj6gwajzFIIXtvEPTaokvwQWlbehi6Ca5jLf2ozhFbtARq4hWtFu5QOf7 eW85vvjNf+uWavG676DH7Dk/yxixZ+fL5EM4aTVJcwkDgutYZDUZaD+zeZDrKo2Uh9 KZuAS/CAqP0EwVzz4WWwiCVk28yWCRmvs7I9SPRo=
Message-Id: <>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 09:23:22 -0700
To: Miles Fidelman <>,
From: S Moonesamy <>
Subject: Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <20140414024956.26078.qmail@joyce.lan> <> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1404132327560.26258@joyce.lan> <> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1404132346420.26386@joyce.lan> <> <> <> <> <> <>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 17:27:12 -0000

Hi Miles,
At 17:53 14-04-2014, Miles Fidelman wrote:
>Depends on what you mean by "significant."


>Now, if you're an ISP or ESP that makes money off of sending bulk 
>email, or providing a home for outbound spammers, maybe you don't 
>consider list traffic to be "significant."  But if you're an 
>individual email USER - I expect that one or two email lists 
>represent the MOST significant part of your email stream.

If the choice is to:

   (a) make money

   (b) put effort into what is in the interest of an individual user

What would people actually do?

What I mean by the word "significant" is what will make a corporation 
think thrice before it does anything against the interests of that 
group of people.  There were a lot of messages on the various mailing 
lists where the topic has been raised.  In my opinion there hasn't 
been any results up to now.

S. Moonesamy