Re: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Wed, 16 April 2014 22:56 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C8D81A0375 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 15:56:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QlpCX4gWZNME for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 15:56:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-we0-x22a.google.com (mail-we0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30B701A0299 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 15:56:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-we0-f170.google.com with SMTP id w61so11593618wes.15 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 15:56:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=sIAVEwwOeovEAbSmvvpEiWkdjovvJ0OmdoPdsHgvT5Q=; b=V/sM/T50tREJW9qDvU/C7xA1/vp0vbyIg1HFOOSpW0k/EjtL+DOHZr13L8q+gNKawM j2u2KbQ3Mq/Zg+utPGym0yi8PL+aS1eRqXcyyQixfvI8kpNATsg06I7myVcpZXhab2dC H3j9dwlPb9cTe2CtOF3lr0/T9veQ0c/gG1xa/CRzppxp41iu/nrBvSo8HQUqB+osE48g QYqxkUj830GbxZ3VKxthNFTu9o0fSfcHJddb0fHAWSzusKz5ZWnGloo8oY+kg2PZRpwB 50jo9CIUUCU1P0MswzF1I2ATL4VyOHwmX2e3t/2wGddN2i/gUBPtJ0/Z3wu3KVT1i+If GprQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.36.101 with SMTP id p5mr9402863wij.8.1397688985420; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 15:56:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.180.90.140 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 15:56:25 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAKHUCzxpwS+nR9wRGOzU_83f7XabMr0pwB5x-MHrqM-28r80kw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CE39F90A45FF0C49A1EA229FC9899B0507D45766@USCLES544.agna.amgreetings.com> <20140414214949.32126.qmail@joyce.lan> <CE39F90A45FF0C49A1EA229FC9899B0507D460CB@USCLES544.agna.amgreetings.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1404142150430.32657@joyce.lan> <CAL0qLwbPMm_i0fqNSGQPv=xZaiNASy=icsRNudaNJ_3PNtX3Og@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1404151832460.38826@joyce.lan> <CAL0qLwZUptJVw85T2FjB2HRGoOvcOUHKiQXeadM0QE9BsFVM9w@mail.gmail.com> <CAKHUCzxpwS+nR9wRGOzU_83f7XabMr0pwB5x-MHrqM-28r80kw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 15:56:25 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwaDjMbNta4HJbpjS-3W9pPC45N+HaBCMXL9XcstPaQ5NQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
To: Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f50345e7b8a0f04f730d320
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/uKNfArn_lE7BwEHy0Nv9sk00Ir4
Cc: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 22:56:30 -0000

On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 1:01 PM, Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net> wrote:

> Unfortunately, the only option I thought was possibly available isn't
> permissible by the specification - therefore, the only solution involves
> alterations to the deployed base, which has been ruled impossible for over
> a year now.
>

Suppose you had the power to crack that barrier and do the impossible.
What would you do?