IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Thu, 17 April 2014 20:47 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D53101A01BB for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 13:47:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.357
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.357 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aA0wWIevHIdV for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 13:47:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78E811A013A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 13:47:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 73351 invoked from network); 17 Apr 2014 20:47:32 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:mime-version:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:user-agent; s=11e86.53503de4.k1404; i=johnl-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=O8yn262K3awSQCRoznEexAIgB71L0QyCPTnsuigtdR4=; b=S957m88NTwbOW/CTMPa8EYjlbQ/CQySWt+weE2lGl1E1y45T+nGKujumniZH4XEeGBR/jtIKpT/qN5ImAGCVc8x78gH2s2XNIXKg9snoFhpBZjNHpYn4Up0CFpSs+4WpiDsN/oidWPg40VYhsrzU4MEqDEr++pwumlkfpApFIRu5a5Q3uA9mFd5aXeWlzalo6E8zfQrfGvRXldF00mNXq9gyQdGY0u2R4SaG41LYwMb6NnoFzyo9I2mj1GfEDIE/
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:mime-version:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:user-agent; s=11e86.53503de4.k1404; olt=johnl-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=O8yn262K3awSQCRoznEexAIgB71L0QyCPTnsuigtdR4=; b=HDznjL+7dgoDgD8tI2T8m3/XHxTH75TZKXslMmY9s36L9aklHXh1H2khEbdEhmwzIBKOGXl6bMKl/j8sarXHzCyQGzM9V0MCDZgrqxuFeKMqPSI4EAi25Uhn7g9ktJC7cLKgTLAAQJktVUy2y/yggI3k8lQRcw2BK9YhKwjn6KjcVbVjc2OovJ0d8NF+5TGhXeiPwM6kzKpgxnrzH1Xox9QqAfJtiygu+9pehRBcDLCSD5PbfnQwcYISUDGkZ/Zk
Received: from jlevine.local ([216.146.45.247]) by imap.iecc.com ([64.57.183.75]) with ESMTPSA (TLS1.0/X.509/SHA1, johnl@iecc.com) via TCP; 17 Apr 2014 20:47:32 -0000
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 16:47:26 -0400
Message-ID: <53503DDE.8090002@taugh.com>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>, Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
References: <CE39F90A45FF0C49A1EA229FC9899B0507D45766@USCLES544.agna.amgreetings.com> <20140414214949.32126.qmail@joyce.lan> <CE39F90A45FF0C49A1EA229FC9899B0507D460CB@USCLES544.agna.amgreetings.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1404142150430.32657@joyce.lan> <CAL0qLwbPMm_i0fqNSGQPv=xZaiNASy=icsRNudaNJ_3PNtX3Og@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1404151832460.38826@joyce.lan> <CAL0qLwZUptJVw85T2FjB2HRGoOvcOUHKiQXeadM0QE9BsFVM9w@mail.gmail.com> <CAKHUCzxpwS+nR9wRGOzU_83f7XabMr0pwB5x-MHrqM-28r80kw@mail.gmail.com> <CAKHUCzzw9mufrTCOBQOkRrZU6wOM21X8Y=FUEKf=qnzS9VESjA@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1404161654430.2065@joyce.lan> <534F1183.6060702@qti.qualcomm.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1404162346400.2194@joyce.lan> <534F5E67.1010307@qti.qualcomm.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1404170824350.2692@joyce.lan> <534FEA0A.4050607@qti.qualcomm.com> <CAL0qLwatX3hm-j+J-RmFp_VShZmZ2y1t0hf45qHhFv8S9opvdg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwatX3hm-j+J-RmFp_VShZmZ2y1t0hf45qHhFv8S9opvdg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/dRL6Jcg7SVrcq1OUavAJEZXowRU
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 20:47:41 -0000

How about ietf-smtp?  It already exists and isn't very busy.

> Just sent you the formal request for a non-WG mailing list, so as Ned
> suggests (and I agree) the discussion can be separate.
>
> -MSK
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email