IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists

Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net> Thu, 17 April 2014 16:28 UTC

Return-Path: <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30C151A01E6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 09:28:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.881
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.881 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vgbznE90Rauj for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 09:28:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server1.neighborhoods.net (server1.neighborhoods.net [207.154.13.48]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 052951A01DE for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 09:28:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by server1.neighborhoods.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 406F1CC0A7 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 12:28:06 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.6.2 (20081215) (Debian) at neighborhoods.net
Received: from server1.neighborhoods.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server1.neighborhoods.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id cwAFt0-dgd8i for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 12:28:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from new-host.home (pool-173-76-155-14.bstnma.fios.verizon.net [173.76.155.14]) by server1.neighborhoods.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7EB32CC0B0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 12:28:01 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <53500111.5000205@meetinghouse.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 12:28:01 -0400
From: Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:28.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/28.0 SeaMonkey/2.25
MIME-Version: 1.0
CC: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
References: <CE39F90A45FF0C49A1EA229FC9899B0507D45766@USCLES544.agna.amgreetings.com> <20140414214949.32126.qmail@joyce.lan> <CE39F90A45FF0C49A1EA229FC9899B0507D460CB@USCLES544.agna.amgreetings.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1404142150430.32657@joyce.lan> <CAL0qLwbPMm_i0fqNSGQPv=xZaiNASy=icsRNudaNJ_3PNtX3Og@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1404151832460.38826@joyce.lan> <CAL0qLwZUptJVw85T2FjB2HRGoOvcOUHKiQXeadM0QE9BsFVM9w@mail.gmail.com> <CAKHUCzxpwS+nR9wRGOzU_83f7XabMr0pwB5x-MHrqM-28r80kw@mail.gmail.com> <CAKHUCzzw9mufrTCOBQOkRrZU6wOM21X8Y=FUEKf=qnzS9VESjA@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1404161654430.2065@joyce.lan> <534F1183.6060702@qti.qualcomm.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1404162346400.2194@joyce.lan> <534F5E67.1010307@qti.qualcomm.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1404170824350.2692@joyce.lan> <534FEA0A.4050607@qti.qualcomm.com> <01P6QXI47QVW00004W@mauve.mrochek.com>
In-Reply-To: <01P6QXI47QVW00004W@mauve.mrochek.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/YXXjv0FsDW2_tA-EQMUC57lKz2g
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 16:28:11 -0000

ned+ietf@mauve.mrochek.com wrote:
>> On 4/17/14 7:29 AM, John R Levine wrote:
>> > Now I'm totally confused.  How does that help me as a sender
>> > distinguish between a good mailing list that is resending real mail
>> > from Yahoo and an evil mailing list that is sending phishes?
>
>> We're now *way* into technical discussion. Let's take those to
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc shall we?
>
> How about we take it some place else? I really don't want this 
> intermingled
> with discussions of things like how to revise the current DMARC 
> specifications
> that hopefully are taking place on that list.

Any proposal as to where?

For that matter, any proposal on where to take the parallel discussion 
of process issues and IETF role?

Miles Fidelman


-- 
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is.   .... Yogi Berra

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email