Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists

"John Levine" <johnl@iecc.com> Thu, 17 April 2014 21:02 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A2C61A0130 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 14:02:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.357
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.357 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t1KZNxl49O04 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 14:02:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F7851A0054 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 14:02:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 75931 invoked from network); 17 Apr 2014 21:01:59 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:mime-version:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:user-agent; s=1289a.53504147.k1404; i=johnl-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=sZWwr0dVxzcHdVOWF7HnihKUEnsL66IgbUq0y+/LK10=; b=f/hZS1NrhMRGiaO+ZY3q4rgmPchJE/LAP1PurMQM4R1F330WI+xCiywSjmBZxH8YWG7S+snSZAvG2fHohOxLKx3Pcx1JpijSFNXqrJA+3xsRfrXwl7qt86H+DY9cPS4mViO/xGjI7CVQTC3hu6SEdEev/NDqekGTw8qp2L3VptgM4SGksmJD61dNky/m/iOq+F8S9pLDNkLEIbvNWvKm05Y20MOmsOsK0iLoPjvwM7eH1m1zgOkIzy1N4vKWRzyv
Received: from jlevine.local ([216.146.45.247]) by imap.iecc.com ([64.57.183.75]) with ESMTPSA (TLS1.0/X.509/SHA1, johnl@iecc.com) via TCP; 17 Apr 2014 21:01:59 -0000
Date: 17 Apr 2014 17:01:52 -0400
Message-ID: <53504140.2020506@iecc.com>
From: "John Levine" <johnl@iecc.com>
To: mrex@sap.com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
References: <20140417205459.785251ACD1@ld9781.wdf.sap.corp>
In-Reply-To: <20140417205459.785251ACD1@ld9781.wdf.sap.corp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/yvbGsYws9hLMTSTxnc2CssvYbY4
Cc: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 21:02:08 -0000

> MUAs that goof the semantics of the "Sender:" header field are either
> not implementing EMail the way it has been specified by the IETF,
> or they goofed the second part of the above explanation for SHOULD.

I wouldn't disagree.  If you can find an Internet where everyone 
correctly implements every RFC, I'd sure like to see it.  In the 
meantime, we're stuck with the one we have.

-- 
Regards,
John Levine, johnl@iecc.com, http://jl.ly
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail.