Re: Meta-issues: On the deprecation of the fragmentation function

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Tue, 09 July 2013 20:50 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D14E321F9CFF for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 13:50:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.444
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.444 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.155, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d1nA3loLI20h for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 13:50:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pd0-x22f.google.com (mail-pd0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::22f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE3BA21F9CF2 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 13:50:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pd0-f175.google.com with SMTP id 4so5565093pdd.20 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 13:50:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=aD7IeQbhzSSrH3iYVUXJxtDCaqrz93YldISMjr9ZwdI=; b=duy0Dm1DvUGPmhp0MAyNxdYMUUuF/zQwVxZXdyRdFLANO6Y6nJskJFHEayqwRnZoSA 0liwcRlEj9sLC0JSGSasxhAkCCQWNkl6nZ7uSi240AzXfOVLIIY9mfojJqs24Y66zRfv 3M+YVhL2GS1pThN17Fu9G3l7bMdiVK5D0zsfN72iDVtyfbdw2mHMZ4J/mSSHxNVJSVd+ MVV5eWzsDzNi+Bgih3yihYDT1C24/r62Z3kVgnXcSh69uK6CDm3knHkvqLwR23ylLnm0 2xtHx6VMTvhcP0KlI7XJbmkgHPeOCRyJMo54OTsR3psCXcXP0Ayo0JQngMPMa0Kz5jpR oVng==
X-Received: by 10.66.26.46 with SMTP id i14mr30262464pag.25.1373403056718; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 13:50:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.23] (211.192.69.111.dynamic.snap.net.nz. [111.69.192.211]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id wi6sm29971425pbc.22.2013.07.09.13.50.54 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 09 Jul 2013 13:50:56 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <51DC77B1.9020206@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 08:50:57 +1200
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: RJ Atkinson <rja.lists@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Meta-issues: On the deprecation of the fragmentation function
References: <FAD482FE-4583-472A-8B57-E789A942686E@gmail.com> <1DF7BDE3-1490-41FE-A959-EC8EC54B0A5F@tzi.org> <8B84E185-36AC-4F22-A88E-5A2F1200AE8B@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <8B84E185-36AC-4F22-A88E-5A2F1200AE8B@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 20:50:58 -0000

On 10/07/2013 05:28, RJ Atkinson wrote:
...
>> But for one problem: adaptation layer fragmentation is
>> *transparent*, so there is no way for an application
>> to do the equivalent of PMTUD to avoid/minimize adaptation
>> layer fragmentation.
> 
> Good point.

And you can't get round it. The decision to raise the minimum link
MTU from 576 to 1280 was not a change in principle; it was just
raising the level at which transparent adaptation layers were
presumed to be acceptable. The big change in principle was the
abolition of on-path fragmentation.

   Brian