IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: FW: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6man-frag-deprecate-00.txt

"Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com> Sun, 23 June 2013 23:02 UTC

Return-Path: <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18AC021F9C74 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Jun 2013 16:02:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5Ihb4LFixxrr for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Jun 2013 16:01:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from slb-mbsout-02.boeing.com (slb-mbsout-02.boeing.com [130.76.64.129]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40DB121F9B83 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 Jun 2013 16:01:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from slb-mbsout-02.boeing.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by slb-mbsout-02.boeing.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/DOWNSTREAM_MBSOUT) with ESMTP id r5NN1sUu024120 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 Jun 2013 16:01:54 -0700
Received: from XCH-PHX-509.sw.nos.boeing.com (xch-phx-509.sw.nos.boeing.com [10.57.37.31]) by slb-mbsout-02.boeing.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/UPSTREAM_MBSOUT) with ESMTP id r5NN1qRs024108 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=OK); Sun, 23 Jun 2013 16:01:53 -0700
Received: from XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com ([169.254.4.48]) by XCH-PHX-509.sw.nos.boeing.com ([169.254.9.166]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.011; Sun, 23 Jun 2013 16:01:52 -0700
From: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
To: Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
Subject: RE: FW: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6man-frag-deprecate-00.txt
Thread-Topic: FW: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6man-frag-deprecate-00.txt
Thread-Index: AQHOb7w5C5ZzwkGsRUquv6wgyw9yxZlD6jrg
Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2013 23:01:51 +0000
Message-ID: <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D983180A7772@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com>
References: <2CF4CB03E2AA464BA0982EC92A02CE2509F85151@BY2PRD0512MB653.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <51C408BC.4030909@forthnetgroup.gr> <2CF4CB03E2AA464BA0982EC92A02CE2509F85BCB@BY2PRD0512MB653.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <51C48776.9070107@globis.net> <2CF4CB03E2AA464BA0982EC92A02CE2509F85FBA@BY2PRD0512MB653.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <51C4AD03.2050303@globis.net> <2CF4CB03E2AA464BA0982EC92A02CE2509F86075@BY2PRD0512MB653.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <51C4BD1E.6030002@gmail.com> <2CF4CB03E2AA464BA0982EC92A02CE2509F8625A@BY2PRD0512MB653.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <20130623024908.8352C362ABA1@drugs.dv.isc.org>
In-Reply-To: <20130623024908.8352C362ABA1@drugs.dv.isc.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [130.247.104.6]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
Cc: "ipv6@ietf.org 6man-wg" <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2013 23:02:02 -0000

Hi,

Deprecation of IPv6 fragmentation would make life difficult for IPv6
tunnels. For tunnels that span paths with ~1280 MTUs, the tunnel ingress'
only option is to fragment since it is not permitted to return a PTB with
MTU less than 1280. See RFC2473 for example of a normative specification
that depends on IPv6 fragmentation.

Thanks - Fred
fred.l.templin@boeing.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email