RE: draft-bonica-6man-frag-deprecate

"Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com> Tue, 09 July 2013 19:11 UTC

Return-Path: <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF8C121F9D7C for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 12:11:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.518
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.518 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.081, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bPfgN6aAU-ir for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 12:11:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from slb-mbsout-02.boeing.com (slb-mbsout-02.boeing.com [130.76.64.129]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FFC021F854D for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 12:11:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from slb-mbsout-02.boeing.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by slb-mbsout-02.boeing.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/DOWNSTREAM_MBSOUT) with ESMTP id r69JBj21019838 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 12:11:45 -0700
Received: from XCH-NWHT-02.nw.nos.boeing.com (xch-nwht-02.nw.nos.boeing.com [130.247.70.248]) by slb-mbsout-02.boeing.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/UPSTREAM_MBSOUT) with ESMTP id r69JBiFL019834 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=OK) for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 12:11:44 -0700
Received: from XCH-BLV-105.nw.nos.boeing.com (130.247.25.121) by XCH-NWHT-02.nw.nos.boeing.com (130.247.70.248) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.297.1; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 12:11:44 -0700
Received: from XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com ([169.254.4.48]) by XCH-BLV-105.nw.nos.boeing.com ([169.254.5.26]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.011; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 12:11:43 -0700
From: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
To: "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: draft-bonica-6man-frag-deprecate
Thread-Topic: draft-bonica-6man-frag-deprecate
Thread-Index: AQHOfNP2SELxKjdOgEeYPWykcTQhxJlcsv4g
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 19:11:42 +0000
Message-ID: <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D983180B766F@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com>
References: <FAD482FE-4583-472A-8B57-E789A942686E@gmail.com> <1DF7BDE3-1490-41FE-A959-EC8EC54B0A5F@tzi.org> <8B84E185-36AC-4F22-A88E-5A2F1200AE8B@gmail.com> <51DC48F7.2080901@dougbarton.us> <2CF4CB03E2AA464BA0982EC92A02CE2509FA39E2@BL2PRD0512MB646.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <51DC5955.4030700@dougbarton.us>
In-Reply-To: <51DC5955.4030700@dougbarton.us>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [130.247.104.6]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 19:11:51 -0000

Hi,

Going back to our discussions from last week, here is a draft that
captures the proposed uses of fragmentation for tunneling and other
purposes. It is called: "Fragmentation Revisited", and it offers an
approach to limited use of fragmentation in a way that can begin to
remove all barriers to supporting larger MTUs in the Internet, i.e.,
even with broken PMTUD, even with broken fragmentation/reassembly,
and even with tunnels.

Think about that for a second. While we currently have burned-in
numbers (576, 1280, 1500) that will never go away, the adoption of
these techniques will ensure that there will never again need to
be another burned-in number even as the Internet naturally grows
to support larger packet sizes. We will then be able to say that
the MTU of the Internet is "unlimited" or rather limited only by
the constituent links, whatever they happen to be. Comments on
the list would be welcome.

Thanks - Fred
fred.l.templin@boeing.com
 
---

From: i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet-drafts@ietf.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 11:50 AM
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
Subject: I-D Action: draft-generic-6man-tunfrag-08.txt


A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.


	Title           : Fragmentation Revisited
	Author(s)       : Fred L. Templin
	Filename        : draft-generic-6man-tunfrag-08.txt
	Pages           : 8
	Date            : 2013-07-09

Abstract:
   IP fragmentation has long been subject for scrutiny since the
   publication of "Fragmentation Considered Harmful" in 1987.  This work
   cast fragmentation in a negative light that has persisted to the
   present day.  However, the tone of the work failed to honor two
   principles of creative thinking: never say "always" and never say
   "never".  This document discusses uses for fragmentation that apply
   both to the present day and moving forward into the future.


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-generic-6man-tunfrag

There's also a htmlized version available at:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-generic-6man-tunfrag-08

A diff from the previous version is available at:
http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-generic-6man-tunfrag-08


Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/

_______________________________________________
I-D-Announce mailing list
I-D-Announce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt